Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Donating Members
  • Member For: 11y 11m 22d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: NOR Perth
  On 03/10/2014 at 9:03 AM, Seaton said:

SSL springs front and rear, the car did have a couple of parts already bolted on when they did the before run. My guess is with the stock tune it didn't work well.

Car has run 12.6 stock at 113mph so I don't think it was lacking power stock.

Stock wastegate and actuator...

True...hope my sssl don't make it too low lol

And that's crazy about stock run...I always wonder what mine will do stock. We shall see one day I guess

But yeah...its all about the final number you get! Maybe spiros dyno reads a little low?

Clearly the guy knows what hes doing...might talk to my tuner and see if he can do tune + full exhaust without any issues....saves $1200; which could go towards a surge or something

Either way good car and good luck with all your future adventures! Lol

Edited by PTR_NITRO_FG
  • WOT?
  • Moderating Team
  • Member For: 12y 2m 22d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Frankston, 3199

Doubt it reads too low - the final number for the baby turbo is bloody respectable.

Am tipping the original run was low for whatever reason (limp right foot?) - 113mph for the 1/4 would take a hell of a lot more than 206rwkw's, but 320rwkw's is probably about where the car is now.

  • Like 2
  • Member
  • Member For: 11y 3m 19d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: near brisbane

that's what I thought . mate has a fg with 313 rwkw and it runs a 12.7 ,and my ba with 312 rwkw runs a 12.8 with a 60" 2.189

  • Donating Members
  • Member For: 12y 8m 21d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Sydney
  On 03/10/2014 at 12:12 PM, I JET said:

Hi mate. Car looks great. I like the wheels. What sort of times are you doing around wakefield. I race 600's there alot and it's interesting to see what times different cars are doing.

I have run a 1.13 around there, keep in mind I am quite new to this so I am hoping next year I can get that down a bit more, one of the other guys here is down to a low 1.08.

  • Donating Members
  • Member For: 12y 8m 21d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Sydney
  On 03/10/2014 at 9:45 PM, gunna said:

that's what I thought . mate has a fg with 313 rwkw and it runs a 12.7 ,and my ba with 312 rwkw runs a 12.8 with a 60" 2.189

Fg with 313 should run 11s

  • Member
  • Member For: 11y 3m 19d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: near brisbane

the fg 113 mph and my ba 112 mph . but both of our 60"were in the 2 seconds .ps both are automatics fg 6 speed and mine a 4 speed .and none had wheel spin

Edited by gunna
  • loitering with intent
  • Lifetime Members
  • Member For: 21y 8m 29d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Zombie Birdhouse

My old BA auto (WhiteTee) used to run mid 12.s @ around 117mph with 251 rwkw

Factory Duncraps

Go the unichimp lol

  • Like 1
  • RNS10S
  • Donating Members
  • Member For: 18y 9m 1d
  • Gender: Male
  On 03/10/2014 at 2:18 PM, Rab said:

Doubt it reads too low - the final number for the baby turbo is bloody respectable.

Am tipping the original run was low for whatever reason (limp right foot?) - 113mph for the 1/4 would take a hell of a lot more than 206rwkw's, but 320rwkw's is probably about where the car is now.

Are you saying Spiro held back on the first run to show a lower number???

So the final result is more impressive???

That's not how he works mate and he does not care about final figures, it's all about how the car performs.

Edited by rednose
  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
  • Create New...
'