Skids4kids in the mid....not the bum like some Member 609 Member For: 11y 9m Gender: Male Posted 13/12/14 09:13 AM Share Posted 13/12/14 09:13 AM I'm a GTX fan and served me really well but I am willing to give a better performing turbo a try.The 6466 1.07 Advertised bolt-on is a pearler that I know spools faster than the GTX with a much bigger hit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phoon508 Member 188 Member For: 12y 1m 14d Posted 13/12/14 12:02 PM Share Posted 13/12/14 12:02 PM The 6466 is a mean turbo but its overkill for what in after. The spool time of the 6235 is what's got me hooked otherwise the gtx would be an obvious choice. If there was e85 close to home then I probably would get the baby gtx, but I really want to crack the 400's on 98. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimmixr Donating Members 686 Member For: 14y 5m 4d Posted 14/12/14 12:13 PM Share Posted 14/12/14 12:13 PM 6235 will crack 400 on 98...Done it..and then some.Brilliant turbo..response is instant. As for reliability. I think people are stuck on the non water cooled units. Haven't heard of one failure yet... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattyP MattyP Cruise Control 6,317 Member For: 12y 8m 19d Gender: Male Location: Central Coast Posted 14/12/14 12:16 PM Share Posted 14/12/14 12:16 PM The 6235 or the gtx3576 would be the only two turbos I'd be considering if I was to upgrade Although the new gtw turbos sound intresting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skids4kids in the mid....not the bum like some Member 609 Member For: 11y 9m Gender: Male Posted 14/12/14 09:06 PM Share Posted 14/12/14 09:06 PM 6466 with the .82 rear housing and VBAND will spool the same as the stock small FG turbo yet have enough wheel on board to crack over 150mph.....spool of baby turbo yet top end of a GT42....ripper turbo and will spool quicker than the 6235 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skids4kids in the mid....not the bum like some Member 609 Member For: 11y 9m Gender: Male Posted 14/12/14 09:07 PM Share Posted 14/12/14 09:07 PM I had the GTX3576 and the top end was a bit meh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimmixr Donating Members 686 Member For: 14y 5m 4d Posted 14/12/14 09:34 PM Share Posted 14/12/14 09:34 PM .82 exhaust housing as compared too??Whats that for housing?Its something Id like to know more about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skids4kids in the mid....not the bum like some Member 609 Member For: 11y 9m Gender: Male Posted 14/12/14 09:50 PM Share Posted 14/12/14 09:50 PM .82 compared to the regular 1.06 99/100 ford guys run.Good enough for XFT F6E to run 9.2s the 6466....1.07 6466 bolt on turbo spools faster than the GTX3582 also. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimmixr Donating Members 686 Member For: 14y 5m 4d Posted 14/12/14 10:25 PM Share Posted 14/12/14 10:25 PM so smaller the number the bigger the housing = more flow? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skids4kids in the mid....not the bum like some Member 609 Member For: 11y 9m Gender: Male Posted 14/12/14 11:27 PM Share Posted 14/12/14 11:27 PM Nope smaller the number means smaller the housing....the idea is to sacrifice some peak from a already great spooling turbo and have it spool even quicker again...yet we still have enough wheel to flow 600rwkw through a ZF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now