330.1Rwkw Fg Standard Turbo..

[ratter]

It's not just driveline, the rods and pistons cop a harder time, wheel spin stops some of the load on things, well until the tyres hook up

[fletty]

Nice job Fletty!!

What tune you going to drive around on Fletty?

Im not guru tuner like J@ but that 19psi tune looks quite strong, doesn't really drop off much.

I thought 19psi was a lot to put through the FG turbo but I'm not gonna second guess spiro's work! Is it 'safe' to drive around on 19psi tune all day everyday?

More than likely the 19psi tune, the lower boost tunes are more for when my other half has to drive it.

It's also 19psi fading back in the top end whilst still holding majority of the power, Spiro is more than happy with the "safeness" of the tune.

^^something does not add up here^^

hey fletty, is yours manual?

that's some strong numbers for stock huffer.

Yea, it is the manual

I did not post Bel's chart to directly compare to the op, I'm sure the op is happy with what he has and that's how it should be, I posted it in reference to people doubting what boost is required to make a certain number.

But a tune should be done to what an owner wants from there car, as a street car I wanted to power delivery to be smooth to make it driveable and not have the boost come on with a rush like the op's (which is why it would benefit of not letting the auto shift late), but as mentioned Bel's car will spin up with this tune so unless trying to impress some kids with the smoke show, the tune is nice on the street which was the reason we chose to do it this way.

Ratter is right on the money there, I wasn't after a low boost tune, with a 300+ outcome at peak rpm, I wanted big power low down with the ability to hold that power right through the rev range. Personal preference I don't see the point of making all the power at almost redline, Yea I can imagine the power delivery is nice and smooth but I make the same power at such lower rpm.

Where I live, we also run 1/8th mile drags so this type of tune is much more beneficial for me and the uses I have for my car :sungum:

Cheers everyone for the positive comments, Is finally good to be able to enjoy my car and get the most out of my set-up!

[Bellato]

Well if Spiro gave you a tune exactly how you wanted it then can't complain with that!

Thanks for the clarification, im looking for progressive power delivery similar to Bel's car using similar mods to fletty just 1000cc injectors and add a PW surge

[stevanford]

I have found this to be true also Mick but only when there is traction and grip, if there is no traction and you are not hitting the rev limiter it's not as bad.

Mine was running 18psi with a similar tune the OPs. In that time I've only run Toyo R1Rs and Nitto NT05s and I've had 0 mechanical issues apart from a faulty BOV.

[rednose]

Guys, you can have a linear power curve or a curve that looks like a cliff, mechanical failures can happen even with stock cars.

The important thing here is Spiro has given the customer what they asked for.

I prefer more boost in the mid as it makes the car feel stronger, I then address wheelspin with wider grippier tyres and settings on my e boost until I have found a balance that I am happy with.

There is no better or worse tune, it comes down to what you want out of your car.

[old_mate]

nice work there on both cars, highlights why I need to spend money on mine.

My car make 300rwkw on 18psi tapering to 15, but I have factory exhaust from dump to tip and soft valve springs. Probably makes less now.

On the street I occasionally see 23 in the mid if you believe the Aeroforce

[fletty]

Cheers old_mate

I will need to look at doing valve springs in the neer future, at the moment they are fine, but for how long they will last only time will tell.

1/8th mile drags will be coming up for me mid may, so will see how it runs then.