What Made You Feel Good Today

[Puffwagon]

Lol 150+ or bust aye? 

 

2 hours ago, discostig said:

Can barely keep my car running 

Me neither but my kids aren't hungry lol. 

 

Priorities mate.

[discostig]

Let's start with blanket sterility and work our way up from there!

 

Life starts at 241 (over the thousand)

[My_XR6_Turbo]

4 minutes ago, discostig said:

Need to invent a thing that causes infertility to be inversely proportional to intelligence and poison global water supplies with it.

The *beep* tried that, turns out most people didn't agree with the concept. 

[discostig]

Dunno who that was before the filter hit, but it would be unpopular because all people are stupid.  Even the smart ones

Edited 14/05/17 01:11 PM by discostig

[Ralph Wiggum]

2 minutes ago, My_XR6_Turbo said:

The *beep* tried that, turns out most people didn't agree with the concept. 

Yeah I posted that. 

 

And forum doesnt like n a z I s apparently 

[discostig]

They were sharp dressers but terrible at parties.

[Puffwagon]

Heh? Wuh?

 

Edit: makes sense after posts appear. 

Edited 14/05/17 01:14 PM by Puffwagon

[bloodycrashboy]

20 minutes ago, Puffwagon said:

Here I was hoping for mass orgies and a mass debate 

 

I didn't know of any Aussie bloke who is not fond of a mass debate 

 

As far as orgies go------they are overated 

[Mrs Jeturbo]

That's surprising,
You don't do man bun sex but screwing with procreation is ok? Not having a dig just actually curious.

I personally feel like Ivf is a tough one.

A recent study showed ivfbabies are a huge amount more likely to develop cancer.
Now call me crazy, but I'm a traditionalist to a point. I think anything that fhuks with the fundemental building blocks like DNA and procreation shouldn't be messed with.

I think it could lead us down the garden path in terms of genetics.
Excluding people who have had an accident etc and just put in the people who "couldn't" have kids naturally. Is there a reason for it? Those two people in some cases may just be non compatible, one may be unable to reproduce. Is this the bodies way of telling us that it's unsuitable? We don't know because we're not advance enough in science to ascertain it yet. Which is why I think ivf mainstream is a bad idea as a society.

Now I don't think anyone who uses the practice is silly or shouldn't as they have their own agendas, and there's multiple forms of ivf, some which carry more risk etc, but I don't think a any less of those who do it.

I just feel as if some things should remain untouched, and procreation and DNA remains in that category until we can gather enough answers to ensure we're not fharkkking with our own species in the long term.

*disclaimer, studies show some ivf procedures could potentially damage the egg on injection etc, hence why a certain type of ivf where the sperm swims on its own to the egg, therefore choosing the strongest sperm and also ensuring it's viability, makes the most sense. However this is the most expensive practice and also he least common today around the world.
This practice and all ivf has the potential to pass on unfavourable genetics.

I'm dyslexic and cannot turn off simple functions in tapatalk

[bloodycrashboy]

2 minutes ago, Frederick said:

I personally feel like Ivf is a tough one.

Yes you are right

And over time I might change my opinion

Especially as people choose more and more certain characteristics for their child

Which to me feels wrong.

 

I used to be pro-abortion until I asked myself the simple question  "when does life begin?"

I am now pro-life, but I don't try to force my beliefs on others

Same same for my other beliefs, I don't force them on others, but I like to talk about them

And as we all know with social media platforms, some things can not be properly expressed without being condemned by others