Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Donating Members
  • Member For: 18y 1m 7d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Gladstone, Queensland
  On 30/03/2012 at 8:11 AM, IH8TOADS said:

I am odd lol. I just tell it as I see it which is based on what the data says.

Nah wiggums 0.7 cover actually spooled better than my 0.5 cover with the 66mm wheel. The shape of the curves were identical.

We both have modified cam tables, and both of us have played with cam timing a fair bit and shared info. Playing with the tune will never recover the lost spool on my car. If I went out and got a twin scroll / twin gate manifold then it would e a different story! XYZ's (think it was him) car is a good example, his big GT42 on a good manifold out spooled his GT3566r on the stock manifold....going by his dyno sheets.

I have an external gate and wiggum has an internal..both same turbine AR. He still out spools me.

He uses HP though which is missing a cam max retard limit table which is TP based.

So you sayin with identical compressor and turbine wheels Lukes spools faster with the .7 housing over your .5?

  • Donating Members
  • Member For: 16y 4m 5d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: CQ

I said it in another thread that I think my .7 on my fg spools quicker then my bf with .5 but that could have more to do with the fg flowing better ect...

  • Donating Members
  • Member For: 17y 6m 7d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Carindale, Brisbane

My old turbo had this setup, made 434rwkw at 19psi on 100 octane, was an impressive setup :-)

  • Silver Donating Members
  • Member For: 19y 9m 5d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: OZ

http://www.fordxr6turbo.com/forum/index.php?app=core&module=attach&section=attach&attach_rel_module=post&attach_id=59582

Difference between the 0.5 and 0.7 cover with a 66mm wheel was buggerall...though the 0.7 had a bit on the 0.5 which I was quite surprised about. It is what it is!

  • Moar Powar Babeh
  • Lifetime Members
  • Member For: 19y 6m 21d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Perth

I really need to run mine up again since changing the exhaust and see if this puts the .66mm .07 over the 66mm .05 down low

  • Donating Members
  • Member For: 18y 1m 7d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Gladstone, Queensland

Dooo eeet!! I just want the smallest turbo that will crack 400rwkw on pump, then do a bullsh*t tune on sucrogen for powercruise!!

  • Like 1
  • I see a red door and I want to paint it black
  • Donating Members
  • Member For: 15y 5m 19d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Far north queensland

wouldn't the smallest that will crack 400 on pump be the stock one?

  • RNS10S
  • Donating Members
  • Member For: 18y 7m 28d
  • Gender: Male
  On 31/03/2012 at 7:20 PM, sexual harrassment panda said:

wouldn't the smallest that will crack 400 on pump be the stock one?

Depends on how high the dyno reads, Autotechs dyno has never seen 400 with a stock 3540 on 98.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Member
  • Member For: 14y 8m 18d

Well I've decided to go the same turbo as veva. With the billet 61 mm wheel and .7 a/r. Dave reckons he hasn't tuned a turbo like this before so hes not sure how it will go but I'm hoping it peforms as vevas did and then ill be a happy man....lol

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
  • Create New...
'