Corzza 777 Member 7,135 Member For: 15y 9m 8d Gender: Male Location: Neutral Bay. Born and Bred in the RSA Posted 01/08/11 01:48 AM Share Posted 01/08/11 01:48 AM I have had a read of this and find it very interesting indeed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beastF6E Member 34 Member For: 14y 14d Gender: Male Posted 02/08/11 12:24 AM Share Posted 02/08/11 12:24 AM The f6 was 251 the gt was 255 both limited , I dont think a manual would have made any difference because they where limited.0-400 they both ran 13.1 and the M3 ran a 12.8 and the isf ran a 12.9.F6 0-100 was 5secs flat and the gt was 5.15 . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveJH Member 52 Member For: 14y 9m 24d Gender: Male Location: Newcastle, NSW Posted 02/08/11 11:21 AM Share Posted 02/08/11 11:21 AM The acceleration figures were slow because it was run on a runway,It wasnt even the runway, it was the taxiway, and it sounds like both the F6 and GT were at the speed limiter, though the F6 barely got to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F16 Member 78 Member For: 14y 9m 9d Gender: Male Location: Adelaide Posted 06/08/11 06:27 AM Share Posted 06/08/11 06:27 AM I think anything nearing the 320kmh mark would need some serious suspension work and good aerodynamics/wings/under car/diffusers to be safe and stable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redman Member 95 Member For: 16y 9m 16d Posted 11/08/11 09:56 AM Share Posted 11/08/11 09:56 AM as per the latest top gear aus magTOO BIG,TOO HEAVY, POINTLESS.......................................... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now