Another Xcal1

[Henz]

Capa don't have support. They are reflashing them illegally, have been for years, and there business ethic is what got the xcal1 turned off in the first place.

[Ralph Wiggum]

^ +1. That panda knows his bamboo from his x-cal

[CBXRT]

Capa don't have support. They are reflashing them illegally, have been for years, and there business ethic is what got the xcal1 turned off in the first place.

That's a big statement and quite unfair on CAPA I would suggest.......

Plus, its not the consumers problem to worry about legality when ordering generic tunes from CAPA going forward. (if people still do that of course)

Edited 05/01/12 04:16 AM by CBXRT

[Henz]

Unfair is Everyone having to buy new xcals because of capa I would think.

Or is it unfair that you think capa can't operate out of there agreements with sct like they used too?

[CBXRT]

Of course its unfair on people who bought the XCal 1 and have been shafted.

No question, in fact I think the 18mth "notice" is questionable at law regardless of the previous opinion. Not that they cant do it, that's fine as a company has rights to do what it needs to, but the resolution offered to good-faith customers (tiny rebate on another purchase) based on consumer affair laws is/was completely inadequate IMO. (the analogue to digital TV comparison is entirely different)

But its also unfair to lay the blame squarely on CAPA, that's all I meant mate.

Edited 05/01/12 10:49 PM by CBXRT