Dillz Three pedals are better then two.. Donating Members 15,637 Member For: 17y 6m 5d Gender: Male Location: Melbourne Posted 03/01/11 10:33 AM Share Posted 03/01/11 10:33 AM PS: GTs are sh*t.I think... wait yep, we just agreed on something. Now what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RynoF6 Idiot Member Donating Members 446 Member For: 14y 10m 10d Gender: Male Location: Muswellbrook, NSW Posted 03/01/11 10:44 AM Share Posted 03/01/11 10:44 AM (edited) Different car ran 12.29 @ 112 mph in WA. Mine stock from dealer ran 12.6@112, spare in boot, stock dunlops and stock filter. 12.4-12.6's very common for these.11.8 Blueboost's car, he said pipes changed because the stock ones are known to pop. Yep stock intercooler.Motor and wheels are crap. The trick is in the launch. You tell me how they got crap times from the cars in the tuners Challenge? Also was done on a dragstrip and not a road with vbox where the sudden rush of boost spins the f6 wheels and the torque limiting on the ZF comes into effect.Stock XR6T FG has gone 12.59.Have a read through here GT335 aint the T6 smasher the mags lead you to believe Edited 03/01/11 10:46 AM by RynoF6 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
'FLYIN F6' Member 16 Member For: 14y 1m 16d Gender: Male Posted 03/01/11 10:51 AM Share Posted 03/01/11 10:51 AM Thanks for the novel 01txr, but mate I was purely stating what my F6 ran standard(except k&n panel) as I stated. And also for the record, Lee who owns RDP was there at the time and saw my run. Lee ran car up on dyno as he was very surprised by the time, and made 386 hp at the wheels. And also I haven't been back to the track yet as I have not even chipped it yet so not much point I thought.But with the rush of power and torque that the F6 TURBO comes on with, I really can't see myself going to the coyote,but agreed they are a very decent powerplant and have put the FPV back on the pedestal where it belongs.Cheers FF6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
'FLYIN F6' Member 16 Member For: 14y 1m 16d Gender: Male Posted 03/01/11 10:54 AM Share Posted 03/01/11 10:54 AM Different car ran 12.29 @ 112 mph in WA. Mine stock from dealer ran 12.6@112, spare in boot, stock dunlops and stock filter. 12.4-12.6's very common for these.11.8 Blueboost's car, he said pipes changed because the stock ones are known to pop. Yep stock intercooler.Motor and wheels are crap. The trick is in the launch. You tell me how they got crap times from the cars in the tuners Challenge? Also was done on a dragstrip and not a road with vbox where the sudden rush of boost spins the f6 wheels and the torque limiting on the ZF comes into effect.Stock XR6T FG has gone 12.59.Have a read through here GT335 aint the T6 smasher the mags lead you to believe Well said RynoF6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
01txr Member 861 Member For: 17y 10m 17d Gender: Male Location: QLD Posted 03/01/11 04:01 PM Share Posted 03/01/11 04:01 PM Potential as in over 1500hp. and yes even quicker times then 8's done by i6. Even the old 5.4 has 7's in the states but mine yes a lighter stang. Agree in not much difference with potential as what's a few tenths of a second anyway. But the the main part of it's potential will be to stay together with it's superior engine design. Also it will have more potential as track engine as in circuit racing. Potential in how quick they have run so far without intercoolers, gearing up the sc or even developing more efficient headers/Extractors, suspension mods. I can recall when the i6 first arrived it took ages for one to run into the 11's. Seems now most do agree the Coyote is by far a more superior engine so that being the case and the rest of the FG being basically identical why then do you i6 guys still think the coyote does not have more potential. I have never said the i6 is not a good performer just that it is not a reliable motor due to it's cost budgeting design that also design originated from the first Aus falcon. Everyone would have to agree the I6 would be so much better and have alot more potential if it was built with forged crank and rods and more square in bore to stroke ratio. However due to it's long crank design it still would not be as good as the Coyote and would not have the engine capacity. The i6 is fantastic for what it is, but honestly if you think it's the better option stay with it while everyone with more than half a brain will choose the much refined Coyote powered vehicle. In plain simple as it gets310kw @ 565Nm v's 335kw @ 570Nm Rest of vehicles are both near identical with no other advantage one has over the other. GT wins. So Joe blow with his stock off the floor i6 is more creditable then motor or wheels magTesting genuine untouched Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
01txr Member 861 Member For: 17y 10m 17d Gender: Male Location: QLD Posted 03/01/11 04:15 PM Share Posted 03/01/11 04:15 PM Ah wait there is more Potenial to rev higher and harder. Try revving a standard crank i6 over 7000rpm for a sustain period of time and see whatHappens, the Coyote crank will do it comfortably. So more engine Capacity & higher revs does not equal more potential prove me wrong. Just can't see a twin turbo'd or even still a geared up blown intercooled Coyote not having more potential then a out dated I6. And yes got to stop biting and wasting my time trying to explain to half brained twats why the Coyote is so much better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest markytheman Guests Posted 03/01/11 09:00 PM Share Posted 03/01/11 09:00 PM ha ha lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cranny Donating Members 123 Member For: 16y 8m 2d Gender: Male Location: Sydney NSW Posted 03/01/11 10:08 PM Author Share Posted 03/01/11 10:08 PM (edited) I find it very interesting that the crummy old I6 only produces 5 NM less than the allmighty coyote. let me just state that some people actually buy these cars stock and leave them stock Hence keeping the warranty. I myself will be buying either the new GT or F6 as a company car. and last time I checked leasing companies dont let you tune the s%&t out of it. so that awsome Coyote with its Supercalfragalistic forged internals and the Updated Flux capacitor will never see its full potential. as far as stock goes some say the F6 is Quciker and some say the GT, I have driven both and I feel that the F6 is quicker. most people dont have a spare 75 k Cash under there bed to fork out for one of these cars let alone another 10k for Mods. lets be realistic guys the i6 Value for money power and Performance is amazing and its proven.just to remind you guys out there of those crummy I6s that are out in the world I made a list.RB26DETTRB25DETRB301JZE BMW M1 HEMI I6( BEAT THE GTHOS ) BARRA 182 (THE FORUM IS BASED AROUND)JAGUAR XJ6 Just a couple of i6s there is a heap of more engines like the above that produce huge HP. Edited 03/01/11 10:22 PM by cranny Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest markytheman Guests Posted 03/01/11 10:27 PM Share Posted 03/01/11 10:27 PM (edited) well said mate. f6 for life. Edited 03/01/11 10:48 PM by RHR No need to quote above post. USE FAST REPLY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
juggernaut Member 71 Member For: 15y 5m 22d Posted 03/01/11 11:36 PM Share Posted 03/01/11 11:36 PM just to remind you guys out there of those crummy I6s that are out in the world I made a list.RB26DETTRB25DETRB301JZE BMW M1 HEMI I6( BEAT THE GTHOS ) BARRA 182 (THE FORUM IS BASED AROUND)JAGUAR XJ6 Just a couple of i6s there is a heap of more engines like the above that produce huge HP.You forgot the best of them all...the mighty 2JZ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now