Most Powerful Na6

[tab]

Up until BF it is...is why the standard plenum looks like a snail. FG turbos though have completely pissed it of.

[Anchor]

Bit of an update on Trav's. Some numbers got mixed up and the cams that Atomic ground him up have "JUST" been touching the pistons since they first went in. So he's taking the oportunity to go a forged bottom end so he can add NOS later. And atomic is building him a cylinder head at no cost.

Stay tuned fellas

[Jamsey]

  On 23/03/2011 at 12:53 AM, turbotrana said:

Definately 4.09s rather than 4.11s, I really noticed the difference when I changed. Its got something to do with bringing the torque on earlier or some crap like that. I am sure if you go down to the pub you could find someone who could explain it a bit better than me.

im not sure if your taking the piss or not..

[Woggster]

What do you guys think of the Jim Mock "DEV2-BA" performance packages, are they good value?

Apparently 172RWKW. Would this go well behind a 4spd or 6 spd auto?

Jim Mock

Edited 31/03/11 09:19 AM by Woggster

[Trav199]

over priced in my opinon..

[Woggster]

What would you recommend instead?

I was thinking:

Typhoon Secondary Cold air intake (Or a Growler intake or Process West etc.)

20% Underdriven Pulley

Maybe a Catback exhaust (Will this even give me more noticable power?)

and a custom ECU flash tune (Can anyone recommend somewhere? e.g. CV Performance, Pit Lane)

Edited 06/04/11 03:36 AM by RHR
No need to quote above post. USE FAST REPLY

[zeropsi]

  On 23/03/2011 at 9:20 AM, Boosted1 said:

Vairable intake runners, ford have had this since the introduction of the Broard band manifold.

No itb's though

[Chris FG N/A]

my mates NA fg xr6 before getting the ZF auto tune, he has had the ZF auto tune done now but hasnt had a chance to run it again yet