Jump to content

Falcon Xr6t Review From America


kramo

Recommended Posts

  • Donating Members
  • Member For: 21y 7m 23d
I find it amusing that a "motoring journalist" couldn't get used to the switched indicators and wiper controls. Me, a meager computer engineer, had it sussed by the time I drove out of the driveway in a loner Focus last time my car was serviced.

We've got one of each in the family & it's relatively easy to get used to. But that's yanks for you....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 26
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Flaccid Member
  • Donating Members
  • Member For: 21y 8m 29d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: NOONAMAH, go figure.....
Somebody posted a link to that article a couple of months back.

One thing that struck me about the article was...

QUOTE 

One place where the Falcon could use more work, however, is in the fit and finish of the interior materials. There were no big problems apparent, just a general lack of sophistication that caused the interior to feel like it is of a lower quality level.

If he thought the Falcon interior was of low quality, I'd love to see the sort of quality that he is used to.

It's the lack of coloured buttons, multiple redundant controls and shiny baubles to dazzel the eyes he's on about, Yanks love plenty of switches and dials to play with.

"sophistication" is having three dials to turn on the A/C when one will do.....

and why oh why can't Australia just conform and go Left hand drive? We can change back from metric while we're at it.......

I think the sss would have had him, it is better, it gives you more time to play with coloured buttons, multiple redundant controls and shiny baubles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Here since the start...
  • Lifetime Members
  • Member For: 21y 9m 24d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Victoria
The 3,735 lb. Falcon sedan is powered by a turbocharged, twin-cam, inline six-cylinder engine mated to a five-speed manual gearbox. Good for 322 hp @ 5,250 rpm and 332 lb-ft of torque (available from 2,000 to 4,500 rpm), the Falcon is capable of reaching 62 mph from a standstill in a claimed 6.2 seconds. And in the Australian mileage tests it returns 20.5 mpg city/27.7 mpg highway. Impressive numbers for so large and powerful a car.

Less fuel used in the city, I don't get that, evrything really is backwards over there! Can someone convert that fuel consumption figure? Miles and gallons is a bit before my time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Flaccid Member
  • Donating Members
  • Member For: 21y 8m 29d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: NOONAMAH, go figure.....

it went 20.5 miles for every gallon used in the city,

27.7 miles for every galon used in the country

less fuel used in the country :o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Here since the start...
  • Lifetime Members
  • Member For: 21y 9m 24d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Victoria
it went 20.5 miles for every gallon used in the city,

27.7 miles for every galon used in the country

less fuel used in the country

Yeah your right! Hey that's me who's backwards.

How about the conversion to litres and kilometres?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Flaccid Member
  • Donating Members
  • Member For: 21y 8m 29d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: NOONAMAH, go figure.....

32.9845 kilometers for every 3.7854118 ltrs city,

44.5693 kilometers for every 3.7854118 ltrs country

????

:o I dunno! That's why I did Geology...No maths!

I assume its U/S fluid gallons......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Flaccid Member
  • Donating Members
  • Member For: 21y 8m 29d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: NOONAMAH, go figure.....

well,

I think its 8.58 l/100k country and 11.72 l/100 city.

either my maths really is cr@p (likely) or this guy drives like a HgAg member.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Firm Member
  • Donating Members
  • Member For: 22y 3m 18d
  • Location: Adelaide Hills
it went 20.5 miles for every gallon used in the city,

27.7 miles for every galon used in the country

less fuel used in the country :o

l use the rule of thumb 9.5lt/100km = 30mpg.

So 20.5mpg = 13.9lt/100

And 27.7mpg = 10.3lt/100

Sounds about right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
  • Create New...
'