Latest Purchase....

[SPIKO]

Your not alone champ!!!

[Headsex]

NVYDF6 is in the same office as me.. Prob wondering why im giggling like a girl.. haha

[tab]

...and take plenty of pics

[Headsex]

HAHA

[IH8TOADS]

Notice I've also mounted the plugs for the injectors downwards.. No ugly injector wires!! (except cyl 1.. I kinda couldnt rotate it once I installed the rail because of the engine lift bracket. But im pulling the std engine out shortly so when I re-install it all, I'll fix it then)

The guage is perm installed, and yes, the fuel reg is adjustable from the top side of the engine bay, and the gauge is clearly visible. it still sits below the plenum, lucky for me, I didnt go too high in the fuel reg position on the surge tank, as it would have hit the plenum.

Strategic measuring I call it... it went something along the lines of this.. "Ahhhh I think it will be perfect ..... HERE"

Im still running 4bar base. But I've got a bit of a tune issue at the moment I'm trying to sort out with the Load and fueling.....

Yeah No.1 is the issue! Have alook how little room is left with the minitimer-uscar adaptor on the ID1000's. The wiring is only just long enough too....wiring length wouldn't be a problem if you rotated them but the adaptors might foul on the runner??

What issue are you finding with the tune & load if you don't mind me asking? Do you think your pressure has dropped when you restricted it to 4bar and then thrown the scaling out? I'm expecting this to happen when I install my turbosmart reg off the factory rail....providing the return line isn't a restiction with just the single 044. I have a feeling that I'm getting more pressure at idle and then less when fuel delivery is increased when on the move...hence the reason I'm experimenting with an adjustible reg to get the scaling correct at more load points.

[Headsex]

Ahh, I dont have those adaptors. I've got little loom ones (Ugly when you see them compared to yours).. So its not such a issue with clearance :D

Tuning wise.. My cars been very neglected since the gt42 went on, I've never plugged into it, only checked afr's, and well, instead of commanded like .80 lambda, ive been seeing .86 or something when I ran it up on the dyno.

When I installed the gt42, I knew the fuel system needed some love, and the second 044 was only a patch job at the time. I wasnt going to waste time on the tune until that was sorted..

So now that its done, I had done some datalogging... And I noticed something weird..

Previously with like 17psi, I was seeing load of about 2.1 as expected, and of course fueling was right.

Now with the GT42, I'm seeing like 20psi, and expected to see 2.3 load.. but no, I'm seeing 1.97 load. VERY Weird.. At least I know why my fueling is off.

Now this is with complete untouched Speed density values. Previously I've found any little trimming I've needed to do is at 6000rpm, which I've simply altered via the base fuel table.

So right now I'm starting with a fresh tune, I know I did some custom binary manipulation in this tune in regards to a 3.5bar map sensor I was playing with.. So I suspect maybe I didnt clear those settings out correctly when I put the original map sensor in place. Will know futher when I play a little more..

d.

[IH8TOADS]

I see, quite unusual....I see 2.1 at ~14.8psi and at ~4650rpm when I jump on it hard. With speed density untouched, my base fuel table is only flat and precise with the ID1000 injectors.....I have to command richer at 3000 - 3500rpm with other injectors.

[Headsex]

Sorry, I ment load of 2.2 with 17psi.. and around yeah, 2.1 with 15psi as you said..

[Headsex]

Here's a bootful yesterday.. notice load peaks at 2.05, and then as rpm's rise, it goes to 1.81.. When you do a calculation of boost desired vs error, and convert to psi, you see at say 5400rpm, it had a load of 1.95, but it had 20.27psi of boost

Time (sec)	AIR_CHARGE_TEMP	BOOST_DESIRED	BOOST_ERROR	LOAD	RPM	SPARK_ADVANCE	SPKADD_AVG_ALL	TP_RELATIVE	WASTEGATE_DC
337.4	117	27.8	0.00	0.64	2170	31.4	0.000	79	0.94
337.8	117	29.0	0.00	0.67	2306	31.4	0.000	91	0.94
338.2	117	30.9	0.00	0.68	2454	31.6	0.000	92	0.93
338.5	117	31.9	0.00	0.69	2530	31.6	-0.180	92	0.87
338.9	116	32.0	0.00	0.70	2625	31.5	-0.439	92	0.73
339.2	116	32.0	0.00	0.70	2738	31.8	-0.439	96	0.59
339.6	115	32.0	0.00	0.82	2950	31.6	-0.375	343	0.77
339.9	115	32.3	13.11	1.01	3283	30.1	-0.275	584	1.00
340.3	115	33.0	24.07	1.20	3657	25.8	-0.159	584	1.00
340.6	114	34.1	17.35	1.53	4117	18.7	-0.159	584	1.00
341.0	114	36.1	5.71	1.86	4994	14.2	-0.159	584	0.65
341.3	113	38.1	-0.96	1.84	5630	12.9	-0.080	292	0.32
341.6	113	36.4	-0.28	1.67	4747	14.5	-0.159	292	0.67
342.0	112	34.0	1.30	1.87	4076	15.4	-0.318	584	0.52
342.4	111	35.4	2.13	2.05	4621	13.5	-0.318	584	0.20
342.7	111	36.7	1.31	2.00	4970	12.4	-0.318	584	0.36
343.1	110	37.1	0.56	1.99	5136	11.2	-0.318	584	0.40
343.5	109	37.7	-0.01	1.93	5379	10.5	-0.222	584	0.43
343.8	109	37.9	-1.69	1.93	5471	11.8	-0.083	584	0.41
344.1	108	37.7	-2.77	1.98	5438	11.6	-0.040	584	0.27
344.5	108	38.0	-3.28	1.95	5636	13.1	-0.040	584	0.18
344.9	108	38.4	-3.60	1.89	5876	15.1	-0.040	584	0.25
345.2	107	38.7	-2.31	1.81	5886	15.1	-0.179	584	0.29
345.6	107	38.2	-2.54	1.88	5245	19.5	-0.159	292	0.14
345.9	108	35.6	-1.72	1.08	4285	26.6	0.000	0	0.00
346.3	108	33.8	0.00	0.13	3912	30.0	0.000	0	0.00

[IH8TOADS]

Yeah seems like its load calc is off. Maybe compare the closed looop PSI with the MAP and BAP calc approach. You running ethanol or someother high octane fuel I gather :-)