aiboart Member 665 Member For: 19y 9m 28d Posted 14/01/10 09:29 AM Share Posted 14/01/10 09:29 AM Mr Hinds indicated that both methods of boosting had their advantages.“In a true performance aspect, turbochargers do require a certain amount of time to spool up. For all-out performance, a supercharger has an instantaneous response. It is more of a racer’s approach to solving that problem,” he said.Mr Hinds then went on to discuss the fuel economy sacrifices common with supercharging. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
londas Member 29 Member For: 20y 11m 11d Posted 14/01/10 09:33 AM Share Posted 14/01/10 09:33 AM Not at liberty to discuss. Very much looking forward to the new V8s though!So it must be true then..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xrt Member 160 Member For: 16y 4m 22d Posted 14/01/10 11:11 AM Share Posted 14/01/10 11:11 AM another quad cam v8?I always assumed the new 5L would be a sohc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paulie2256 Donating Members 7,441 Member For: 15y 11m 21d Gender: Male Location: SE Melbourne Posted 14/01/10 01:22 PM Share Posted 14/01/10 01:22 PM (edited) I was waiting for someone to start this thread...Looks like it will be blown by an Eaton twin screw and produce 325KW with 600NM. << The limitation of the ZF.Not sure if source is reliable as it has come from motor mag.... Edited 14/01/10 01:28 PM by Paulie2256 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bunna Donating Members 813 Member For: 18y 2m 18d Posted 14/01/10 10:23 PM Share Posted 14/01/10 10:23 PM So the bloke that wrote this article has asked a couple of US engineers what they think of supercharging, and turned that into a "scoop". What a crock. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete A Member 442 Member For: 15y 11m 9d Gender: Male Location: Castle Hill NSW Posted 15/01/10 02:05 AM Share Posted 15/01/10 02:05 AM Whatever happens it will be interesting how Ford deals with the enormous success of the XR6 and boosted models. What do you do for an encore? Depending on what they do and seeing this thread about the Coyote, I might be tempted back to an 8 on next replacement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evil F6 Donating Members 830 Member For: 18y 10m 3d Gender: Male Location: Sydney Posted 15/01/10 02:56 AM Share Posted 15/01/10 02:56 AM Very underwhelmed by the figures Motor's quoting. 325kW for a blown 5.0l is pretty lame and really a low boost version making 10kW less, sounds ridiculous. I could just believe a low boost version making 315kW but a hipo would want to be making 350+kW. And how does a blown V8 only make the same numbers as a turboed 4l.Where does this leave the F6?Still looking forward to the potential 100kg weight saving the Coyote V8 brings and hopefully the SC system doesn't add 50kg straight back on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest XR09 Guests Posted 15/01/10 03:08 AM Share Posted 15/01/10 03:08 AM Ford needs to go back to it's roots here I think.Keep the XR range simple and basic, light weight and only a few options, then you could keep the n/a6, 6T and give the 8 some oomph with the real motor.Then you could have the FPV range as it was when it started, same power or a little more, but with all the bells and whistles, and exclusive bumps and buldges.Why FPV doesn't ADR one with 20"x 30's or 35's exclusive to FPV has me baffled, expecially as they are making a new upper control arm anyway. They would have to make the GS the new XR. The GS is not different enough to be a FPV really for mine. That way the XR8 could keep it's cred. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bunna Donating Members 813 Member For: 18y 2m 18d Posted 15/01/10 05:00 AM Share Posted 15/01/10 05:00 AM Very underwhelmed by the figures Motor's quoting. 325kW for a blown 5.0l is pretty lame and really a low boost version making 10kW less, sounds ridiculous. I could just believe a low boost version making 315kW but a hipo would want to be making 350+kW. And how does a blown V8 only make the same numbers as a turboed 4l.Where does this leave the F6?Still looking forward to the potential 100kg weight saving the Coyote V8 brings and hopefully the SC system doesn't add 50kg straight back on.Why would you believe motor? they haven't even put a picture of the right engine in their article Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paulie2256 Donating Members 7,441 Member For: 15y 11m 21d Gender: Male Location: SE Melbourne Posted 15/01/10 01:03 PM Share Posted 15/01/10 01:03 PM Firstly,keeping the power figure low is a smart move IMO. No doubt hsv will just increase capacity to compete. All fpv have to do is increase boost. That engine has a lot more in it than 325 however if they give you 400 then hsv will release 401kw and so on. Secondly, numbers mean nothing. This engine is a lot lighter than the current boss. So who cares what kilawasps the car has when it will already destroy anything from hsv and a million times better to drive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now