Dyno Junkie Member 254 Member For: 17y 8m 7d Gender: Male Location: Ascot, Western Australia Posted 05/01/10 11:59 AM Share Posted 05/01/10 11:59 AM Looked into the FG manifold for our Territory last year, in the end it was easier to go with a Process West plenum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XtRmn8 570Nm @1800rpm Donating Members 2,441 Member For: 21y 2m 2d Gender: Male Location: Perth, WA Posted 05/01/10 12:35 PM Share Posted 05/01/10 12:35 PM Will be interesting to see the results and gains. Also FG vs a plenum on a BA/BF.As long as the cost is reasonable and the gains are good then I see no reason why people would not be interested. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest EGOXRT Guests Posted 16/01/10 06:05 AM Share Posted 16/01/10 06:05 AM (edited) Ok, just a small update. Started on the conversion yesterday, what a Pita of a job to get that carp off..For those thinking of doing this be warned it is not for the faint hearted. The first problem you will encounter is the water pipe from the thermostat housing that goes around the back of the motor, it fouls the FG manifold and needs to be modified.I cut mine, and swung it around to clear the manifold, and will join it using rubber hose. The FG pipe is totally different and will also need to be modded so,I thinkit it easier to just cut the existing one up. You will need to bead the pipe ends and re plate it!.The next is clearance between the TB bend and bonnet, I made the bend as tight as possible and managed 15mm, not much but hey, it doesn't foul. This is because the BA TB is much higher than the FG one plus, the adaptor I made up adds 10mm to the height. Then there is the joys of getting the piping right. I ammaking temporary piping with the PW stage 2 ones that I had fitted, then off to a fabricator... Also, the dip stick bracket needs to be cut off, and relocated lower down, no big problem there though..Overall if you are not REALLY handy with tools I would not attempt this, I am so, it is a viable option for me. A couple of pics for those interested.. Edited 16/01/10 06:06 AM by EGOXRT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PHANTMXR6 It's not a MKI! Member 1,742 Member For: 16y 5m 4d Gender: Male Location: Earth Posted 16/01/10 06:45 AM Share Posted 16/01/10 06:45 AM Any reason you've mounted the throttle body at a 45 degree angle instead of straight on the manifold? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TURBO4LT Member 1,533 Member For: 21y 3m 6d Gender: Male Location: NSW Posted 16/01/10 09:12 AM Share Posted 16/01/10 09:12 AM Looks interesting, will be good to see the final product. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dyno Junkie Member 254 Member For: 17y 8m 7d Gender: Male Location: Ascot, Western Australia Posted 16/01/10 09:22 AM Share Posted 16/01/10 09:22 AM Any reason you've mounted the throttle body at a 45 degree angle instead of straight on the manifold?I agree, it must cause some flow issues at certain revs/boost.Also would have gained more room under bonnet using a right angle adaptor between the manifold and thottle body, this would have had the throttle body sitting horizontal instead of vertical and as a side benifit increased the overal plenum volume . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest EGOXRT Guests Posted 16/01/10 12:39 PM Share Posted 16/01/10 12:39 PM It had to be mounted at that angle in order to be able to adapt to the manifold. The bolt spacings will not allow it to adapt any other wayunless, you fasten the adapter from below, pita!!You will suffer about the same ill effects from mounting it this way as the FG does, none.You could mount it in a similar fashion to the PW throttle body relocation, but why move the butterfly further away from the manifold entry, that makes no sense at all. Who says there is a need to increase the volume of this manifold any more tan what is at hand, bigger isn'talways better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JVK Silver Donating Members 751 Member For: 18y 11m 6d Gender: Male Location: North West Hot Hell,VIC Posted 17/01/10 04:08 AM Share Posted 17/01/10 04:08 AM Looks good EGOXRT dont worry about others comments, it will work fine.It has ample plenum volume as well.Good to see you having a go at it and posting it up.I for one cant wait to see the end results. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest EGOXRT Guests Posted 17/01/10 04:19 AM Share Posted 17/01/10 04:19 AM (edited) Thanks JVK. It will be interesting to see the results, that is for sure. There will be a couple of higher powered cars using these in the near future also, albeit with a different TB, that will also be interesting!If the thing has enough volume to flow 600+ rwkw, I think it will do what I want, no problems. Edited 17/01/10 04:20 AM by EGOXRT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JVK Silver Donating Members 751 Member For: 18y 11m 6d Gender: Male Location: North West Hot Hell,VIC Posted 17/01/10 04:26 AM Share Posted 17/01/10 04:26 AM Your right on the money. 600RWKW + should be more than enough for most lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now