Peter J Member 37 Member For: 15y 10m 11d Gender: Male Location: Melb. Posted 11/12/09 01:10 PM Share Posted 11/12/09 01:10 PM How much quicker is a STOCK FG F6 to a STOCK BF Mk2 F6, (ZF Autos) 0 - 400 meters.Thought I had read something like this:FG about 12.5 ??Cant find anything on BF F6 times.Peter Link to comment https://www.fordxr6turbo.com/forum/topic/64288-fg-f6-v-bf-mk2-f6/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZAP No boost, no bottle, just my foot on the throttle! Lifetime Members 7,935 Member For: 21y 3m 15d Gender: Male Location: Sydney Posted 11/12/09 09:32 PM Share Posted 11/12/09 09:32 PM BF = 12.9-13.1FG = 12.5-12.9Different tracks and drivers will yeild different results.My BF F6 ran 7 x 13.0-13.1, where an identical F6 on the dame night ran 12.9. The driver did weigh 50kg less than me :locked: Link to comment https://www.fordxr6turbo.com/forum/topic/64288-fg-f6-v-bf-mk2-f6/#findComment-962454 Share on other sites More sharing options...
rspecf6 Banned 138 Member For: 17y 25d Gender: Male Posted 12/12/09 04:42 AM Share Posted 12/12/09 04:42 AM no numbers to quote, however my recent r-spec 285ATW would not come close to the f6 310, this is right across the rev range, inc 0 to 100, 400mtrs and further.the 80 to 120k is outstanding!!!! Link to comment https://www.fordxr6turbo.com/forum/topic/64288-fg-f6-v-bf-mk2-f6/#findComment-962563 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter J Member 37 Member For: 15y 10m 11d Gender: Male Location: Melb. Posted 12/12/09 08:30 AM Author Share Posted 12/12/09 08:30 AM Thanks for that guys,Was the FG F6 you ran stock??If you have 285 rwkw (310+ flywheel kw)what must the FG 310 have? I would think it was not stock.. (but I could be wrong?)Peter Link to comment https://www.fordxr6turbo.com/forum/topic/64288-fg-f6-v-bf-mk2-f6/#findComment-962623 Share on other sites More sharing options...
rspecf6 Banned 138 Member For: 17y 25d Gender: Male Posted 12/12/09 08:47 AM Share Posted 12/12/09 08:47 AM (edited) Peterthe rspec was 285ATW tune injectors ect, not sure on the 310 ATW numbers however is is a far better vehicle in all areas the only thing that I could be about is the spark cut during auto changes under power.Overall a far better package all round and "feels" stronger across all the rev range than the tuned r-spec that I had. Edited 12/12/09 09:03 AM by ZAP STOP QUOTING THE POST ABOVE !!! Link to comment https://www.fordxr6turbo.com/forum/topic/64288-fg-f6-v-bf-mk2-f6/#findComment-962628 Share on other sites More sharing options...
rspecf6 Banned 138 Member For: 17y 25d Gender: Male Posted 12/12/09 08:55 AM Share Posted 12/12/09 08:55 AM (edited) This was off a different site , certianly feel like it, compaired to the rspec at 285ATW.????What an interesting week its been for FG tunes. Some of the power figures for these things is blowing my mind.FG F6 Auto. 294 RWKW's stock FG F6 Auto 301 RWKW's stock ...... W T F Now fitting same exhaust as my car and tune.G6ET 254 RWKW's stock 290 TUNE only........FG XR6T Auto 249 RWKW's 283 TuneThese figures are amazing.Now I realise mine had only 80 kms on it when I ran it when it made 283 rwkw's but we have a few now and NONE have done over 285 till Now.How they arent selling mroe when you have this much power on tap blows me away.We are starting to get quite a few come through now so I thought I would make a thread and see how much variation there is.The first ones comming through where 235's and 240's.. now its all chang Edited 12/12/09 09:03 AM by ZAP READ ABOVE Link to comment https://www.fordxr6turbo.com/forum/topic/64288-fg-f6-v-bf-mk2-f6/#findComment-962631 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buf-Phoon loitering with intent Lifetime Members 13,318 Member For: 21y 9m 10d Gender: Male Location: Zombie Birdhouse Posted 12/12/09 09:11 AM Share Posted 12/12/09 09:11 AM The tuned figures may be credible but those stock figures are BS or a happy dyno IMOOn the road, with all the reduced piping and smaller compressor wheel on the Ts the FG will spool up very quickly Link to comment https://www.fordxr6turbo.com/forum/topic/64288-fg-f6-v-bf-mk2-f6/#findComment-962635 Share on other sites More sharing options...
rspecf6 Banned 138 Member For: 17y 25d Gender: Male Posted 12/12/09 09:55 AM Share Posted 12/12/09 09:55 AM Australian Ford Forums - FG Turbo Ford power figuresnot sure who wrote, however a opion none the less Link to comment https://www.fordxr6turbo.com/forum/topic/64288-fg-f6-v-bf-mk2-f6/#findComment-962643 Share on other sites More sharing options...
discostig Manual mode ________________________ All day, erryday Donating Members 13,798 Member For: 17y 6m 5d Gender: Male Location: Probably above atmospheric pressure Posted 13/12/09 05:14 AM Share Posted 13/12/09 05:14 AM That'd be Simon from Xtreme Ford Tuning here in WA running the cars on his dyno. Wow what numbers, 301 at the wheels from a stock FG F6! @_@ Link to comment https://www.fordxr6turbo.com/forum/topic/64288-fg-f6-v-bf-mk2-f6/#findComment-962808 Share on other sites More sharing options...
rspecf6 Banned 138 Member For: 17y 25d Gender: Male Posted 15/12/09 08:51 AM Share Posted 15/12/09 08:51 AM On 12/12/2009 at 9:11 AM, Buf-Phoon said: The tuned figures may be credible but those stock figures are BS or a happy dyno IMOOn the road, with all the reduced piping and smaller compressor wheel on the Ts the FG will spool up very quicklyso whats your thoughts on the above are they bs or a happy dyno, or just correct Link to comment https://www.fordxr6turbo.com/forum/topic/64288-fg-f6-v-bf-mk2-f6/#findComment-963348 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now