Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Im the one and only
  • Donating Members
  • Member For: 20y 5m 13d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: In my house

Didnt the goverment give a handout to keep the engine manufacturing plant open?I thought they scraped the V6 to keep jobs in OZ.

  • Replies 102
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Member
  • Member For: 16y 10m 18d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: North West Aus

Yeh I thought that too. Maybe it was only a 2 year budget or something. I pesonally reckon Ford should D/I the I6. More Aussie Jobs and still a aussie made engine.

  • Member
  • Member For: 22y 1m 25d
  • Location: Geelong Victoria
  On 24/12/2009 at 9:52 AM, F6Rdodg said:

2010 will see the end of current format I6 and Boss no matter what due to EuroIV Emissions control.

I6 may go direct injection, but unlikely as they (Fraud) already have the V6 twin turbo planned from the US powerplant, and will unlikely ever match the power and torque of the I6, so the F6 as we know it is likely to be canned long term.

Same goes for V8 Boss is dead - Coyote will be the next platform. They're alloy, stll have overhead cams, but lighter and higher revving, and with force fed air, should scream.

If they release a revised F6 with the current I6 retuned to 320+Kw and 600NM, it will have to be before July and Euro IV comes in, and absolutely will have to come with 265+ rear tread and beefier lower suspension as standard to put the power down.

As more than 60% of FPV sales are V8's most likely scenario is a broader range of Coyote based V8's N/A, supercharged and a single model V6 with the twin snails.

The V8's I'm guessing will need to be the big sellers to bring FPV's fight to HSV.

There will hardly be any difference between current I6 and the Euro 4 version.

Guest XR09
  • Guests

It really does not make any sense

BMW's strait 6 is one of the best motors in the world, sorry ford fans. But it is, and it meets the euro 4 easily. It has fantastic throttle response from it's twin turbo and the noise it makes it awsome.

Why would Ford drop the strait 6??? We already have it. It works, because its basic and uses less moving parts then a V6. It's naturally better balanced. If we go to a V6 then it will be a 60 degree and need balancers and bits. more weight and more to go wrong.

Lets just bring the old faithful into 2010 with an alloy bottom end to save weight. Maybe square the bore up for higher rpm and let it run it's course.

Pffft the V8, big heavy lots of moving parts. The old 6 is not dead, it has years left in it.

  • Member
  • Member For: 22y 1m 25d
  • Location: Geelong Victoria

All comes down to cost. Why spend money developing 2 different engines when one can do the job. Part of Fords One Ford policy of eradicating product duplication.

I'd give the I6 until 2015.

The new Mustang 3.7 V6 makes 227 kw without DI.

  • Donating Members
  • Member For: 20y 11m 12d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Sydney

Hopefully the inline six hangs around for a whyle yet , somethings are not trully appreciated untill they are gone imo

I still recall the marketing bullcrap add on tv ,when the new Dunnydore engine appeared on the engine Dyno ,with tossers in white coats revving it up,it sounded like a camry LOL

Same engine ended up in alfas and a few others I cant recall

I recall reading a motoring article,where the journo commented along the lines: Why would they invest so many millions bottom.gif (Holden ),yet this new locally produced engine is Harsher,unrefined,less powerfull then its predecessor A 30 year old buick 3.8 ?

I hope Ford can learn from this lesson,if it aint broke dont fix it,who cares when ignorant people say: Ford is still using a 30 year old design with the I6!,It works perfectly and more to the point it kicks ass

icon_ford.gif3gears.gif

  • Member
  • Member For: 20y 5m 5d
  On 27/12/2009 at 10:28 PM, RIPGMH said:

...

I hope Ford can learn from this lesson,if it aint broke dont fix it,who cares when ignorant people say: Ford is still using a 30 year old design with the I6!,It works perfectly and more to the point it kicks ass

icon_ford.gif3gears.gif

Well said, I recall that Porsche learnt a similar lesson with the 911 and 928 experience.

Cars that command a premium and make big profits are sold on more than performance and fuel consumption numbers.

This is not because numbers lie, it is just that it takes an lot of numbers to convey the essence of the driving experience.

To date no one has ever been able to generate the numbers that show what is so attractive about the 911, or the Harley that they command such astounding prices and premiums.

Regards,

aa

  • Member
  • Member For: 16y 11m 11d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: glenwood

am keen to raed about this in upcoming moter mag or wheels... should expect some news pretty soon I would think..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
  • Create New...
'