Jump to content

Under Battery Cai Vs. Airboxed 3" Cai &. 4" Cai


RSK

Recommended Posts

  • Member
  • Member For: 17y 2m 12d
  • Gender: Male

Hey people,

Currently going from a 3" CAI in an airbox and wondering what the difference would be going to a 4" CAI?

Has anyone done the change and what were the noteable differences?

Advice from anyone that's gone from an under battery setup to a 3/4" CAI with airbox would be good aswell :spoton:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 38
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 4 months later...
  • RUS531
  • Donating Members
  • Member For: 18y 3m 5d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Emerald QLD

I might get grilled by saying this but I would not put an under battery CAI in my car due to the fact that they look like they will be a pain to service and they are down too low and in front of the front wheel that kicks up dirt/dust and water. I've got the PW cai box and if it ain't recieving enough air I don't know what will. Am I correct in saying that you have to do some cutting to install the Under battery cai

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Donating Members
  • Member For: 16y 5m 11d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Gold Coast, QLD

The UBP works well, and wasn't that hard to get to. it is enclosed really well too if you keep the undertray on your car. I have changed to a Rapid 4inch intake from the ubp, only cos I'm trying to 'over engineer' my car so I don't blow it up again, pmsl. That and I really wanna tidy up my engine bay... big car show on soon!

It has actually crossed my mind to install a standard headlight on my drivers side, so it allows air through the 2 scollops from where the xr headlight would normally sit into my air box... I think it would look sh*tty but am gonna give it a go n e way, have a headlight from my work car I can experiment with it b4 installing my motor.

Edited by mattyb
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • EVIL T
  • Member
  • Member For: 15y 11m 16d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Liverpool NSW

a 2.75" (70 mm) intake from from rapid/plazmaman is bigger than the inlet of the tubo, so is it really necessary to upgrade to a 4" intake? is the extra hassle of battery relocation not worth it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...
  • Donating Members
  • Member For: 21y 10m 7d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Sydney, NSW

a 2.75" (70 mm) intake from from rapid/plazmaman is bigger than the inlet of the tubo, so is it really necessary to upgrade to a 4" intake? is the extra hassle of battery relocation not worth it?

I agree... plus I don't really see what's wrong with stock airbox (with 2nd intake) and piping. it's a bit long, but the diameter should be enough...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
  • Create New...
'