Dyno Sheet

[bluprinturbo]

ok,new cooler pipes etc which is the best retaining stock plenum? and yet another retune.might try chiptorque,anyone had any work done there.yeah I stuffed up that run big time,it was my first ever so I guess practice will help.no wheelspin just a crap launch.if I can match hullks time ill be happy.

[xr6t_ute]

At that time I had a process west st 2....works very well at 300 but if you going beyond that like 350ish I suggest you go for a stage 3 version or a big one from the other brand names.Theres a guy on here selling a st2 ....

Give C&V a call and have a chat to them I see there got a lot of cars running great times.

[senna_T]

CV are in Sydney, Elite have run plenty of quick times and should be up to the task

[The_Bogan]

no offense but that's a crap dyno graph, it hits 200rwkw and the just falls off badly, compare it to one of my graphs from when my ute was making similar power and you can see how steep my curve is compared to yours, that means on the road I would have left you for dead.

what mods did you have done when your car was making similar power? no to cars are the same!

and it all comes down to how the run is loaded up on the dyno as to what the line on the graph will look like.

heres a dyno printout of my car showing that it wasnt given full throttle from 60kmh, but eased up to maybe 80kmh or 90kmh then full throttle.

my car has similar mods though the turbo is 100% standard. no actuator or porting yet.

I can post up some different dyno sheets that make the graph look a sh*tload different, due to the way it was loaded up on the dyno

ans steve, dont worry about your times too much yet mate!!! practice makes perfect!!! and I would be changing that cooler very soon!

Edited 22/01/09 01:35 PM by The_Bogan

[F6R]

When comparing graphs, make sure you are looking at them on the same scale. You can change the axis values to make the graph look like anything you want.

[Buf-Phoon]

"smoothing" what a wonderful concept

[FSIX]

one graph is in wheel speed and one is in rpm so im not sure how you came to that conclusion as they are both measured in different units.

Hi do you have any dyno sheets run in the correct 6F mode?

Industry standard for dyno dynamics dyno helps when when comparing sheets.

[Panda Eyes]

why? mine was measured in 8f. whats the difference?

[Headsex]

8f's ramp rate is too loose to load up the turbo to its full boost potential. 6f is better, but still a "little" loose incomparison with the road

[turbotom]

no offense but that's a crap dyno graph, it hits 200rwkw and the just falls off badly, compare it to one of my graphs from when my ute was making similar power and you can see how steep my curve is compared to yours, that means on the road I would have left you for dead.

well I don't know how you read dyno graphs etm, but steve's motor has you beat for power spread based on what you've shown on your chart.

the "steep" curve you mention is an indicator that you haven't got as much power (more importantly, torque) available as Steve at lower rpm.

Given that under full wide open throttle you can expect to be in the range of 3500~6000 over the quarter, then

I wouldn't be gloating you'd have had him beat based on that dyno curve!

given that 200 km on ETM chart would relate to around 6000 rpm, then some comparitive data can be estimated....

rpm est kph ETM Steve

@ 3000 100 80 212

@ 3500 117 160 235

@ 4000 133 248 272

@ 4500 150 280 288

@ 5000 167 300 305

@ 5500 183 315 307

@ 6000 200 315 295

I'm assuming that ETM's low power data below 3000 rpm is due to loading factors on the dyno, cause if it's only putting out 80 rwkw at 3000 then it's a slug!

Steve, contrary to what you've been told, you have a strong motor.

I assume you have had your gearbox strengthened, as you are generating a substantial torque at lower rpms.

I'll bet your car really gets up and "boogies" once you hit 3000 rpm under boost.

cheers

tom

aka 68vet