Headsex Donating Members 2,528 Member For: 19y 4m 11d Gender: Male Location: Melb Posted 06/12/08 12:19 PM Share Posted 06/12/08 12:19 PM (edited) Try and tell me I am at 1000ft when the time flashes up!!! The guy @ the post is looking sideways @ me... I am guessing the 60ft time is wrong... It wasnt that bad a launch...I am claiming my 11.67 boys... I also ran it in slow mo and got a time of around 11.6-8 from first movement to when I am at the sign using Nero... I know the angle is bad... But that's how it is!JUST AFTER THE SIGNYour 60foot did look like a 2.6 60foot from the video.Compare your timeslip to another car that ran today.. Worm XRDose60' 2.616 2.241330' 6.442 5.685660' 9.289 8.403mph 88.99 90.831000' 11.672 10.719ET 11.671 12.676MPH 24.43 116.55Everything makes sence until your ET and your final MPH.. Looking at the mid track(660) MPH of 88.99, compared to XRDose's 90.83, and his final MPH of 116, shows that yours cannot be 124mph, but infact is 24.43 as printed (as it was displayed also on the time board)Also the ET is 0.001 is less than the 1000' mark, Indicates a Timing problemGoing by the increments between each timing point(ignoring the incorrect Final MPH), you have a approx 13.5 pass at approx 115mph.. I'm sure this MPH would be very similar to the second Drag you ran which you totally wheelspun out of the hole (the final MPH will still be very close)Now working simple drag racing math into this. To improve on this 13.5 pass, you would need to bring the 60foot down to, say 2.0 at least. taking 6tenths is 1.2seconds ET.So, given the tune exactly how it is, if you could launch it with good rubber, technically you should be able to get a 12.5 at least Edited 06/12/08 12:21 PM by Headsex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guests Posted 06/12/08 12:27 PM Share Posted 06/12/08 12:27 PM (edited) sorry bud (worm) but I think your kidding yourselfyou have neither the power, tires or the launch to get close to 11.6@124 Edited 06/12/08 12:30 PM by Ford_esky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Worm A much better forum Silver Donating Members 3,808 Member For: 16y 4m 29d Gender: Male Location: Victoria Posted 06/12/08 12:30 PM Author Share Posted 06/12/08 12:30 PM LOL my 13.8 second time was @ 97MPH...I had pulled off the gas a long time before the end of the quarter... Work that one out!you have neither the power, tires or the launch to get close to 11.6@124Thanks for your input... :-) I am sure many cars have been in the 11s with 480rwhp??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guests Posted 06/12/08 12:34 PM Share Posted 06/12/08 12:34 PM (edited) yeah if it was an auto on drag tires with a sub 2 second launch yours is none of theseyour timeslip show at each interval your slower then a car that ran 12.6 except for the last time. so for your 11.6 to stand all the first numbers are wrong and the last one is right. or more then likely all the other numbers are right and the last one is wrong Edited 06/12/08 12:38 PM by Ford_esky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R-SPEC You are a dead set goose Silver Donating Members 3,968 Member For: 19y 22d Gender: Male Location: Melbourne Posted 06/12/08 12:38 PM Share Posted 06/12/08 12:38 PM Ah well, at least you now have the fastest manual XR6 in the country! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YPURV4 KILL,KILL,KILL,DIE,DIE,DIE, Member 2,813 Member For: 18y 7m 18d Gender: Male Posted 06/12/08 12:40 PM Share Posted 06/12/08 12:40 PM LOL THIS SITE IS SO FCKING FUNNY, if its not some ones "tune/tuner" that's sht, or some "shops" gear , now its calder park has fcked up with there timing board. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Headsex Donating Members 2,528 Member For: 19y 4m 11d Gender: Male Location: Melb Posted 06/12/08 12:40 PM Share Posted 06/12/08 12:40 PM Thanks for your input... :-) I am sure many cars have been in the 11s with 480rwhp???Autos, Yes.Manuals? BCL's BA is a perfect comparison.. Higher MPH than yours, 135 vs assumed 124(printed as 24), Better 60foot than yours, 2.2 vs 2.6But his has run 11.9... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Worm A much better forum Silver Donating Members 3,808 Member For: 16y 4m 29d Gender: Male Location: Victoria Posted 06/12/08 12:45 PM Author Share Posted 06/12/08 12:45 PM (edited) His has much more power, hence more likely to wheelspin from 100-200 he admitted he changes gears slowly...How did you get 10.9@ 126MPH and he got 11.93@ 138MPH??? I know yours is AUTO blah blah blah... But does it make sense? His ET is much higher than yours, but his time is MUCH slower...My is 1 second slower than yours... And 2MPH slower at the end... I would have been slower at 60 foot than you... but my speed has caught up between 60 foot and 1/4 mile...ie. Danny is 1.6 @ 27MPH... Worm is 2.6 @ 20MPH... But then I start pulling harder cause my tune is better... And I get closer to your 126MPH... Hence you increase from 27 MPH @ 60foot to 126MPH @ 1320foot...And I increase from 20MPH @ 60foot to 124MPH t @ 1320foot...In between we end up running pretty much the same time... Mine a bit faster cause I have gone increased 104MPH whereas you have increase 99MPH.... Its not that hard to work out...Ever think someone might be able to drive a manual well... Get good shifts, no wheelspin and have a nice tune that doesn't produce way too much torque and cause wheelspin?Its easy... Just watch the video... It shows take off @ 10.5-11 seconds and ending around 22-22.5 seconds... (ie. 11.67 difference!) Hence the reason I filmed it.Worm Edited 06/12/08 12:59 PM by Worm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Headsex Donating Members 2,528 Member For: 19y 4m 11d Gender: Male Location: Melb Posted 06/12/08 12:48 PM Share Posted 06/12/08 12:48 PM (edited) LOL THIS SITE IS SO FCKING FUNNY, if its not some ones "tune/tuner" that's sht, or some "shops" gear , now its calder park has fcked up with there timing board.Dude, your missing the "FACTS".. No one here is saying X Y or Z is sh*t, mearly we're trying to highlight the fact that the timeslip and the timing board in the video are a direct evidence there is a timing error.. the 24 MPH is indicative of that! the 1 (for 124) never failed to Light, It didnt print on the timeslip either.. that's why we're saying its a timing problem.I"m looking at a timeslip here, of a Auto BA, And I suggest you go find your 11.8 second timeslip of yours to Also compare60foot - 2.19660' - 7.769mph - 98.79ET - 11.767MPH - 118.04Worms Mid track ET was 9.289, and mid track MPH was 88.99.. Not even close to this timeslip here Edited 06/12/08 12:51 PM by Headsex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YPURV4 KILL,KILL,KILL,DIE,DIE,DIE, Member 2,813 Member For: 18y 7m 18d Gender: Male Posted 06/12/08 12:51 PM Share Posted 06/12/08 12:51 PM Another thing on the tyre's JP run 11.02 on street tyres.funny how some things are forgoten in relation to debating.fck the time slip what about the vid, the time adds up WATCH IT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts