Doogstar Member 276 Member For: 17y 11m 21d Posted 20/06/08 11:49 AM Author Share Posted 20/06/08 11:49 AM Hey Coop,Welcome to the forums mate.No, a BA T would need more mods to pull these figures. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doogstar Member 276 Member For: 17y 11m 21d Posted 20/06/08 11:56 AM Author Share Posted 20/06/08 11:56 AM nice result and a ripper power curve Dougy.....should be looking to shave a second of your ET if not more...Hey Rob, how you going? It is a ripper power curve isn't it? there is a huge powerband for sure, climbs up high very quickly and just stays there.I know it will be heaps faster down the track , I won't say what I am hoping for as I could jinx myself. You should come up to Heathcote, Dave is going race for the first time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
recoop Member 25 Member For: 16y 11m 27d Posted 20/06/08 12:04 PM Share Posted 20/06/08 12:04 PM Hey Coop,Welcome to the forums mate.No, a BA T would need more mods to pull these figures.Thanks for the welcome, and I have not come across another site where the people are as welcoming and knowledgeable about the machinary they drive as this one.I have read that much on the site about T's and the mods that can be done that you get to th epoint that you don't know whether to buy a BA or BF, Mk1 or Mk2, or do I spend another $1000 on the Bike and curl up in the corner to have a think!Please correct me if I'm wrong, but don't BA's and BF's produce roughly the same KW's standard?If they do, given that it will take more mods to get the same performance from a BA as what you have acheived with your BF, are you just better off spending a bit more and buying a BF from the get go? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tab Sucker Moderating Team 32,303 Member For: 20y 7m 23d Gender: Male Location: Brisbane Posted 20/06/08 12:14 PM Share Posted 20/06/08 12:14 PM Yeah standard they do, rated at 240kw vs. 245kw (both at the flywheel)But they were gradually strengthened throughout the models up to the point that the later model BF mkI and mkII’s were basically the same spec as the typhoons. So in a nutshell a BF mkII is a better starting point but it’s all relative. Your choice of transmission will also come in to play as well, but that’s best left for another thread....& Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
recoop Member 25 Member For: 16y 11m 27d Posted 20/06/08 12:20 PM Share Posted 20/06/08 12:20 PM Thanks tab, that corner I was talking about sitting in now sounds even better.Nice result from what I have seen Doog. Keep up the mods and go Lion hunting! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doogstar Member 276 Member For: 17y 11m 21d Posted 20/06/08 01:01 PM Author Share Posted 20/06/08 01:01 PM Like it been said the BF is a better base, but the BA's are not exactly slow either.A few more mods and Lion hunting won't be considered sport anymore. lolI think my next mod will be slotted rotors and decent pads. I think I will have to put my factory rims back on as my 19" haven't got enough grip to hold it down now. At least until I get some new rims or new tyres for the old rims. It got a bit hairy out there tonight in the wet, maybe because I am not used to the power yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doogstar Member 276 Member For: 17y 11m 21d Posted 22/06/08 08:34 AM Author Share Posted 22/06/08 08:34 AM Well just got back from Heathcote, ran a new PB of12.83@110.9mph 60ft=2.1165Best 60 was 1.9487, but stuffed up on a gear change.This was done in street trim except for MT Streets.Previous PB stock with airbox on factory tyres was 13.62@104.19 60ft=2.128 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
markxr6t Member 476 Member For: 20y 1m 19d Location: Perth WA Posted 22/06/08 12:35 PM Share Posted 22/06/08 12:35 PM Fantastic time with just a tune - well done! That's what I call bang for your buck!Just for comparison, I recently ran consistent 12.7s at 112.5mph and 2.2 60fts with 262rwkw. However - I've got injectors + tune. I was initially disappointed with my rwkw, but happy with the times! Dunno if bigger injectors allows more torque to be dialled in down low????Just got back from a country run today and got 9.4L/100km (measured). Gotta be happy with that! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doogstar Member 276 Member For: 17y 11m 21d Posted 22/06/08 12:55 PM Author Share Posted 22/06/08 12:55 PM (edited) Cheers mate, I think that we are fairly close, different tracks and conditions and different dynos.Still getting used to the ZF box. I was changing a bit late and hitting the limiter.Not sure what effect the bigger injectors would allow, maybe some more timing in the tune? Well done with your times. Edited 22/06/08 12:58 PM by Doogstar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doogstar Member 276 Member For: 17y 11m 21d Posted 28/06/08 01:06 AM Author Share Posted 28/06/08 01:06 AM Went to Calder last night, it was so crap only got two runs.However I did get a new PB running the same setup12.702@174.21kph (108mph) 2.051 60ftHere are some shots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now