Jump to content

F6 Rear Springs Advice


R-SPEC

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • You are a dead set goose
  • Silver Donating Members
  • Member For: 19y 2m 12d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Melbourne

:blink:

The F6 above looked low enough to my eye, but I guess we all have different tastes (or it could have been the angle of the photo). Like most others here, I went for the 'level sill' effect by using KFFL-57 and KFRL-68SSL King Springs front and rear respectively. The front looks good, but the rear has settled too much for my liking (the top of the tyre is just beginning to disappear under the guard - and I'm not a fan of the 'dumped' look). This spring combo is what King Springs recommended in their catalogue for XR series cars (the current catalogue has changed part number names a little).

They also recommended using KFRL-68SL springs on the rear of non-XRs, and in hindsight I think this would have been the best option for me. The SSLs meant I had to cut off some of my bump stop, which indicates to me that it's too low. I may well remove my SSLs and replace them with SLs in the near future - this will still be lower than normal XR height with a firmer spring rate to boot, but not as low as it currently is.

It's just the back I want to change. The front looks great (even if it is a gimmick). I only want it to sit as the front does. Looking at arch height, the tyre is in line with the top of the arch, and the back sits a little higher. All I want to do is equal them out, so it looks like the a pair of SLs for the rear is the way to go for me then.

Thanks for your help bugster :spit:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Donating Members
  • Member For: 19y 9m 9d
  • Location: Canberra

No worries mate, that would be my inclination too. Remember also that it'll take a while for the springs to settle - I was initially happy with the ride height of the SSLs, but after they settled it was too low for me. Anyway, good luck and let me know how you go! :blink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
  • Member For: 19y 10m 19d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: New Zealand

I have an XR6T BA mk2 - standard springs in front and SSL rears. Here is a photo - shows the ass down a bit, but to be honest it is more level than this photo shows.

post-6309-1211258502_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Here since the start...
  • Lifetime Members
  • Member For: 21y 9m 17d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Victoria
The F6 above looked low enough to my eye, but I guess we all have different tastes (or it could have been the angle of the photo). Like most others here, I went for the 'level sill' effect by using KFFL-57 and KFRL-68SSL King Springs front and rear respectively. The front looks good, but the rear has settled too much for my liking (the top of the tyre is just beginning to disappear under the guard - and I'm not a fan of the 'dumped' look). This spring combo is what King Springs recommended in their catalogue for XR series cars (the current catalogue has changed part number names a little).

They also recommended using KFRL-68SL springs on the rear of non-XRs, and in hindsight I think this would have been the best option for me. The SSLs meant I had to cut off some of my bump stop, which indicates to me that it's too low. I may well remove my SSLs and replace them with SLs in the near future - this will still be lower than normal XR height with a firmer spring rate to boot, but not as low as it currently is.

Since you R-Spec owners have BF MkII's you can forget about all of the above. He's talking about a BA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Donating Members
  • Member For: 19y 9m 9d
  • Location: Canberra
Since you R-Spec owners have BF MkII's you can forget about all of the above. He's talking about a BA.

Not necessarily. Can't speak 100% for any differences between an XR6T and an F6, but according to the King Springs catalogue, spring applications are the same for both BA and BF vehicles. I would imagine they would be the same for FPV equivalents too?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Forged Member
  • Lifetime Members
  • Member For: 18y 4d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: SW Sydney

there is a difference bugster, Jman recently had SL's but in his BF, the springs were actually the BA part and the front of his ute was almost touching the ground! It was mentioned somewhere else that BF2 is different again I'm pretty sure

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
  • Create New...
'