Mrs Jeturbo Bob the Freaking Builder Donating Members 10,813 Member For: 15y 4m 2d Gender: Female Location: SA Posted 05/01/17 10:52 AM Share Posted 05/01/17 10:52 AM So you'd be happy with a little girl walking past a fully grown man pissing in a urinal? Hmmmm They dont need to see that... especially if the guys is a predator... ive seen some messed up chit in my time... at primary school the guy in my year 7 class used to touch himself in class in silent reading and he got caught jacking off into the urinals. Now I know this doesn't happen frequently but he's obviously got some mental issues, what if he was "trans" as decided by a psychologist and he did that sh*t in the girls toilets ... my 5yo girl doesnt need to see that. I guess the thing is puff they believe they're that gender so people Argue that they are 13 yo girls not boys Even though they have a pen*s. If this was about adults who can comprehend this then that's ok with me. I wouldnt give two sh*ts peeing in a cubicle next to a guy. Kids are differrnt... how can thwy define their own gender at such a younf age. Personally I dont know if I'm comfortable with over the top pc attitudes changing basic things in our society. What next? My kids colour blind so we have to only use black and white colours now so they don't feel left out? Cmon! We already cant sing ba ba black sheep or put peanut butter sandwiches in our kids lunches... where does it stop? So your kid is trans? Ok whej theyre so 18 let them make a decision and til then they were born a boy. Is pissing in a boys toilets gonna hurt them? No... because if it did then the origional argument about unisex toilets and it being ok to gender share toilets is flawed. At what point do they have to meet what criteria to be an actual Trans at school? Or can I just say I wanna be a boy today and walk in the toilet? They're kids, let kids be kids and the gender they were born with be it until they're functioning cognitively enough to decide other wise. Maybe that's 13... maybe it's 18... but not primary school age surely. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
k31th less WHY; more WOT Site Developer 29,138 Member For: 16y 9m 5d Gender: Male Location: Melbourne Posted 05/01/17 10:56 AM Share Posted 05/01/17 10:56 AM (edited) Yes. Urinals are only "visible" in the way you're thinking if you specifically look for it when you're standing next to somebody at the urinal. People who aren't using a urinal won't have that predicament. If somebody goes out of their way to look, who cares? the internet is far worse at a click of a button. 16 minutes ago, Frederick said: I wrote a reply 3 times and it got deleted by my stupid phone coz in the shower and the water effects the buttons.... flaw of waterproof phones wpmo If you weren't using tapafark... the forum has a feature that remembers the last thing you were typing in a thread, which might have saved you Edited 05/01/17 10:58 AM by k31th Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Box stock T. Member 1,384 Member For: 9y 9m 7d Posted 05/01/17 10:58 AM Share Posted 05/01/17 10:58 AM I had forgotten how much I do enjoy a round golf. Its been a few years, I reckon atleast three since I have been for a hit. Perfect way wrap up my Christmas holidays me thinks.. Back to work Monday, but I'm cool with that I've had a pretty relaxing couple of weeks. So I'm definitely ready to go back. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Puffwagon Trust me bro... Gold Donating Members 16,055 Member For: 9y 11m 16d Gender: Male Location: South Australia Posted 05/01/17 10:59 AM Share Posted 05/01/17 10:59 AM Ironically the formation of the majority of our legislation is based upon the suppression of malicious intent. Just recently in the news there was an article of a 15 yo girl that was railed by 25 dudes in the school toilet block. Who thinks that it's ok to let the younger kids near that situation? Raise your hands. Imho if anyone thinks that there would be no negative consequences with mixed gender toilets combined with gender disorientation/mental illness they are being naive. In a perfect world it would work. Unfortunately this world is far from perfect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Box stock T. Member 1,384 Member For: 9y 9m 7d Posted 05/01/17 11:00 AM Share Posted 05/01/17 11:00 AM Hey fluff you and jetstar keeping cool out your way. It's gonna been a stinker tomorrow.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pixy Angel Expert Donating Members 9,132 Member For: 19y 10m 18d Gender: Male Location: North Jamberoo, NSW Posted 05/01/17 11:01 AM Share Posted 05/01/17 11:01 AM (edited) I have no idea whats happened here but there is NO way in hell I'd let my 4-5-6 any age girl or boy use the toilet without me or mum. I use the disable toilets for that very reason. It doesn't matter if you're a male or a female I dont trust any MOFO to many weirdo's out there EDIT - it's worst for a young girl to walk into a male toilet than a boy to walk into a female toilet. It's just the way society is. Edited 05/01/17 11:05 AM by Pixy Angel 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
k31th less WHY; more WOT Site Developer 29,138 Member For: 16y 9m 5d Gender: Male Location: Melbourne Posted 05/01/17 11:04 AM Share Posted 05/01/17 11:04 AM 1 minute ago, Puffwagon said: Ironically the formation of the majority of our legislation is based upon the suppression of malicious intent. Just recently in the news there was an article of a 15 yo girl that was railed by 25 dudes in the school toilet block. Who thinks that it's ok to let the younger kids near that situation? Raise your hands. Imho if anyone thinks that there would be no negative consequences with mixed gender toilets combined with gender disorientation/mental illness they are being naive. In a perfect world it would work. Unfortunately this world is far from perfect. it's a bit off topic to the discussion, but how often is "malicious intent suppression" a successful strategy in legislation? In those circumstances of "extreme cases" like you mention, then like I said earlier, it won't matter what the signage on the toilets is or the rules about using the toilers are, those edge cases will still occur; so those cases are a moot point in the argument about normal toilet use. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mrs Jeturbo Bob the Freaking Builder Donating Members 10,813 Member For: 15y 4m 2d Gender: Female Location: SA Posted 05/01/17 11:10 AM Share Posted 05/01/17 11:10 AM I have no idea whats happened here but there is NO way in hell I'd let my 4-5-6 any age girl or boy use the toilet without me or mum. I use the disable toilets for that very reason. It doesn't matter if you're a male or a female I dont trust any MOFO to many weirdo's out there EDIT - it's worst for a young girl to walk into a male toilet than a boy to walk into a female toilet. It's just the way society is.Spot on! A 6yo was raped by two 12yos at school recently... and a 5yo raped by a man in a public toilet at a park also. No way I'd let even my boys in the toilet alone... parents room or disabled. I still take huds to the ladies room atm... but if there's no alternative id walk into a men's room any day with huds if I had to. Can't imagine too many blokes giving a sh*t.. I wouldnt care if there was no alternative and a guy had to come into the ladies with his young daughter. Its not like we get out flanges out on the counter and finger bang each other in there... sorry to disappoint keith 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
k31th less WHY; more WOT Site Developer 29,138 Member For: 16y 9m 5d Gender: Male Location: Melbourne Posted 05/01/17 11:14 AM Share Posted 05/01/17 11:14 AM A very small minority of people will care if all toilets are established as unisex. That small minority will get over it within a very small amount of time (at most, a generation). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Puffwagon Trust me bro... Gold Donating Members 16,055 Member For: 9y 11m 16d Gender: Male Location: South Australia Posted 05/01/17 11:17 AM Share Posted 05/01/17 11:17 AM (edited) Do you even lawyer bro? We have legislation, police that enforce it, lawyers that say it wasn't me, witnesses that say yes you did and a judge that decides which evidence holds greater weight. It is less likely for assaults to occur, mainly against females, if we separate genders, especially if there are mental health issues present. Kinda like it's less likely for life changing accidents to occur because we impose "abritary" regulations upon sex, drinking and driving etc. Edited 05/01/17 11:20 AM by Puffwagon 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now