Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Every Mod's Favourite Member
  • Member
  • Member For: 17y 2m 13d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Melbourne
  CV PERFORMANCE said:
Mate sounds like a very high reading dyno as the norm we have seen is around 155 awklw and modded WITH injectors about 250-265

CV PERFORMANCE

You may be right, as I doubt the bung removal would push it from 155 to 194 in stock form.

I guess a track time will tell all, so I'll post up what it does down the quarter. That'll give us something firm to compare against.

Either way, I'm stoked with the results, as it drives beautifully.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Member
  • Member For: 17y 7m 2d

I would say 315 fwkw. I dont think the percentage argument stacks up. I think you lose X amount of kw through your drivetrain regardless of your power output.

Years ago they always said 30%-35% drivetrain loss but that is on stock power. Now all of a sudden its about 21%.

But note this....

165kw Expensive Daewoo V8 made 108rwkw stock so 35% drivetrain loss (lost 57kw)

245kw XR6T made 190rwkw so 21% drivetrain loss (lost 55kw)

BOSS 290 mades 230rwkw (lost 60kw)

Expensive Daewoo 307 makes 245rwkw (lost 62kw)

Three cars lost around 55-65kw.

Im sure its no exact science but I say it would be a number regardless of your power rather than a percentage which would diminish as power rises. My number comes from adding 65kw to your rwkw.

  • Member
  • Member For: 17y 7m 2d
  CV PERFORMANCE said:
Mate sounds like a very high reading dyno as the norm we have seen is around 155 awklw and modded WITH injectors about 250-265

CV PERFORMANCE

I have a magazine (MOTOR) where it was quoted that on CV's dyno a stock XR6T (240fwkw) did 182rwkw.

  • Donating Members
  • Member For: 18y 1m 2d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Sydney

hulk, what if the car only makes 70KW on flywheel? does that mean it will only have 10 KW on the wheels?

I think it's percentage rather then an actual number.

  • Moderating Team
  • Member For: 22y 3m 17d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Sydney

Generally, you multiply the rwkw figure by 1.34 (which is actually horsepower conversion), which roughly gives you flywheel kilo's.

This is very general, old wives way. Chucking 4WD into it may upset it a little.

  • Member
  • Member For: 20y 10m 3d
  • Location: Darwin

So you reckon a T with 55kw at the flywheel wouldn't be capable of moving at all? :tonguepoke:

  hulk xr6t said:
I would say 315 fwkw. I dont think the percentage argument stacks up. I think you lose X amount of kw through your drivetrain regardless of your power output.

Years ago they always said 30%-35% drivetrain loss but that is on stock power. Now all of a sudden its about 21%.

But note this....

165kw Expensive Daewoo V8 made 108rwkw stock so 35% drivetrain loss (lost 57kw)

245kw XR6T made 190rwkw so 21% drivetrain loss (lost 55kw)

BOSS 290 mades 230rwkw (lost 60kw)

Expensive Daewoo 307 makes 245rwkw (lost 62kw)

Three cars lost around 55-65kw.

Im sure its no exact science but I say it would be a number regardless of your power rather than a percentage which would diminish as power rises. My number comes from adding 65kw to your rwkw.

  • Every Mod's Favourite Member
  • Member
  • Member For: 17y 2m 13d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Melbourne

I'm going to tear out my motor so we can settle this once and for all.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
  • Create New...
'