Guest DZ. Guests Posted 14/01/03 10:45 PM Share Posted 14/01/03 10:45 PM Not sure about the consumption, but the recommended fuel for XR6 Turbo and XR8 is Premium Unleaded (I.e. Optimax, etc).My leasing company has also requested that I only use Optimax for my NA XR6 and have covered the additional expense of that fuel. Optimax is a 98 RON fuel - you only need 95 RON for the XR6T (any premium). The difference between 95 and 98 RON is usually 2 or 3 cents. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PSI40L Member 175 Member For: 22y 30d Posted 15/01/03 11:58 PM Share Posted 15/01/03 11:58 PM The difference between 95 and 98 RON is usually 2 or 3 cents. Not around sydney it isn't . Any way got a load of normal unleaded couple of weeks ago and didn't really see a difference makes me a bit sceptical sometimes of what I am really buying . I think the xr8 is 9.5: 1 comp u can easily run standard unleaded no problem. Fuel consumption who cares when u got V8 power... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turbo6man Lifetime Members 4,084 Member For: 22y 3m 6d Gender: Male Location: South Coast NSW Posted 16/01/03 09:06 AM Share Posted 16/01/03 09:06 AM Turbo and XR8 will run on standard unleaded. The only difference is Turbo won't make 240kw on std. unl. XR8 is rated at 260kw on std. unl. This is what Falcon brochure advises. GT will require premium due to higher comp.They claim XR8 will use 12.5l/100km.How do they test for this fuel consumption figure?? I'd suggest unless you're doing a heap of highway driving, you won't see 12.5. Isn't the XR6T also listed as 12.5?? Nope the XR6T is 11 point something on the windscreen sticker I seem to remember. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJF077 The Noble Leader Administrator 4,786 Member For: 22y 3m 5d Gender: Male Location: Sydney Australia Posted 16/01/03 09:17 AM Share Posted 16/01/03 09:17 AM Actually it says 12.5L/100KM. I still have the sticker in my log book. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Djelibeybi Code Monkey Member 265 Member For: 22y 2m 6d Location: Canberra, ACT Posted 16/01/03 07:43 PM Author Share Posted 16/01/03 07:43 PM The NA XR6 is rated the same, 12.5L/100km. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest raoulc Guests Posted 17/01/03 02:18 AM Share Posted 17/01/03 02:18 AM I only ever use Optimax - even on the AU Fairmont Ghia V8 I traded in for my XR6T.But the fuel consumption is a whole lot worse. I can get 120 km more per tank on my old Ghia compared to my new XR6T. That is comparing on exactly the same conditions. Driving from Albury to Sydney along the Hume Boring Hwy. Dealer tells me its because the car still has to be broken in. I doubt it though. The difference is 240 - 175 = 65Kw power. That being the case its understandable and who cares - love that 65Kw extra power Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Trevor Guests Posted 17/01/03 02:25 AM Share Posted 17/01/03 02:25 AM I find similar to Raoulc.I am also in the Albury area and travel on the Hume hwy.I am actually getting 12.2 - 12.5 using cruise. It is more than the AUXR6 but who cares.If you bought this car it wasn't for the fuel economy anyway.I like to drive mine the way it is meant to be driven so around town it uses about 16l/100km Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DZ. Guests Posted 17/01/03 05:03 AM Share Posted 17/01/03 05:03 AM Hmm - Albury to Hume huh? That's a 110 km/h zone (ie 115 km/h cruise) which means your force feeding it a little - might be why you're consumption is higher. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest harasn Guests Posted 07/02/03 02:49 AM Share Posted 07/02/03 02:49 AM Check out this thread on LS1.com. It would appear that Mr hamburglar should have a look at the real world figures for the fuel consuption of his Holdens before he bags our Fords http://www.ls1.com.au/forum/showthread.php...=&threadid=8942His test figures might be really good but when people actually drive the cars they can't get near it. Fords are a *beep* of a lot closer to the truth. Funny they seem to do the same thing with power fugures. Say its better than it is and we say its worse than it is. Just food for thought if your wopndering which car to buy!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mondie Firm Member Donating Members 2,924 Member For: 22y 2m 16d Location: Adelaide Hills Posted 07/02/03 03:16 AM Share Posted 07/02/03 03:16 AM l often hire Late model camira Execs with work and while there are many things l dont like about the car, l cant knock the fuel economy.Repeatably get better than 9lt/100 mainly highway cruising in unloved rentals. Cant knock that. The Commie is around 150kg lighter than the BA but that's Fords fault for making the BA so heavy when other manufacturers are making theirs lighter. l hate to think what the new Fairlane is going to tip the scales at.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now