INFLYT Donating Members 784 Member For: 18y 5m 29d Gender: Male Location: N.S.W, Sydney Posted 17/01/07 09:22 AM Share Posted 17/01/07 09:22 AM The "standard chassis rails" clause came up because in other classes, particularly the VL Turbo class which is a very similar car, a few of the guy's were building a tube chassis, which could take virtually any shell over it, and dropping VL panel's over it. By bringing in that rule, it basically mean's whack the biggest power OEM motor you can in it, the strongest gearbox you can, the fattest slick's you can up the back without cutting out the standard tub's, and go for Gold! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCRIBR Yaris member Member 4,486 Member For: 18y 6m 18d Gender: Male Posted 17/01/07 10:12 AM Share Posted 17/01/07 10:12 AM AHHHH.. thanks INFLYT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dannopower Donating Members 421 Member For: 19y 7m 2d Gender: Male Location: Canberra ACT Posted 21/01/07 12:26 AM Author Share Posted 21/01/07 12:26 AM The "standard chassis rails" clause came up because in other classes, particularly the VL Turbo class which is a very similar car, a few of the guy's were building a tube chassis, which could take virtually any shell over it, and dropping VL panel's over it. By bringing in that rule, it basically mean's whack the biggest power OEM motor you can in it, the strongest gearbox you can, the fattest slick's you can up the back without cutting out the standard tub's, and go for Gold!←Thanks for that mate.So stuff like 4 link rear ends in ute etc is ok? Im guessing the Nizpro "Skyline" rear end would be out though right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now