AceofSpades Boostaholics anonymous Member 202 Member For: 18y 6m 3d Gender: Male Location: Broady Posted 29/09/06 09:44 PM Share Posted 29/09/06 09:44 PM 'Aparantley' the garrets chosen were developed and used to aleviate excessive EGT's and etc.being built to suit the engine, its fairly unlikeley that they will change the specs, unless they find a cheaper supplier.they may downsize the turbo, but they cannot really choke off the turbine side any more.. what they can do is redice the inducer size.the consequences this carries are the need to increase boost to retain output, extra torque loading on the driveline earlier as the smaller rotatong mass should in theory reach boost threshold earlier ( commonly refered to as lag, even though the term is incorrect.)One other thing for them to look at with this option is the fact that they will then be running the fuel systems at higher pressures as a result of increased boost, so they would likley re-engineer the fuel system and so on and so forth.while it is possible, there are way to many pitfalls into twidling the proven combo UNLESS there is a sizeable financial benifit in doing so.We as the motoring public generally will take a back seat to all this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TurboDewd FG Falcon fan! Member 1,452 Member For: 21y 7m 7d Gender: Male Location: Canberra Posted 29/09/06 10:34 PM Share Posted 29/09/06 10:34 PM Speculation - waste of time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Here since the start... Lifetime Members 10,282 Member For: 21y 9m 18d Gender: Male Location: Victoria Posted 29/09/06 10:47 PM Share Posted 29/09/06 10:47 PM I've heard the same story.As for the current turbo being used it's my understanding that Ford had to use a turbo bigger than required because Garrett wouldn't cover anything smaller under warranty for more than 12 months. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fat-Tony Member 5,364 Member For: 18y 10m 23d Posted 29/09/06 11:27 PM Author Share Posted 29/09/06 11:27 PM I've heard the same story.As for the current turbo being used it's my understanding that Ford had to use a turbo bigger than required because Garrett wouldn't cover anything smaller under warranty for more than 12 months.←prob from the same source as I lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xlnt6 Donating Members 350 Member For: 20y 4m 12d Gender: Male Location: Melbourne, Victoria Posted 30/09/06 11:18 PM Share Posted 30/09/06 11:18 PM (edited) Yes, it was true, as part of development for the Orion drivetrain, they did think about smaller turbo configuration, because they were already significantly re-engineering the induction of the I6. They actually did this as part of the development of the Territory T, as the original spec for the TT was at a reduced power output. But this is one point up for the bean counters.... it was decided that it would cost more to re-engineer it, so that ended sticking with what they have already !!So given there are several Orion drivetrain configured test mules already going around using the same turbo (but with a different inlet and manifold piping configuration), then it is unlikely they would change such a significant component this late in the game.Also given the new F6 has to make the target power of 300-310 fwkW @ 580 NM and then leave room for future upgrades, it wouldn't make much sense to downsize.CheersRobin. Edited 01/10/06 01:15 AM by Adam Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iconic Bionic My engine bay is Bionic Donating Members 3,726 Member For: 18y 10m 25d Gender: Male Location: Freeways Posted 01/10/06 06:49 AM Share Posted 01/10/06 06:49 AM Hmm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aiboart Member 665 Member For: 20y 29d Posted 01/10/06 07:59 AM Share Posted 01/10/06 07:59 AM Yes, it was true, as part of development for the Orion drivetrain, they did think about smaller turbo configuration, because they were already significantly re-engineering the induction of the I6. They actually did this as part of the development of the Territory T, as the original spec for the TT was at a reduced power output. But this is one point up for the bean counters.... it was decided that it would cost more to re-engineer it, so that ended sticking with what they have already !!So given there are several Orion drivetrain configured test mules already going around using the same turbo (but with a different inlet and manifold piping configuration), then it is unlikely they would change such a significant component this late in the game.Also given the new F6 has to make the target power of 300-310 fwkW @ 580 NM and then leave room for future upgrades, it wouldn't make much sense to downsize.CheersRobin.←How does the induction vary to the current setup for the T? Is there a new system specific to NA and another to turbo applications?Any news of lightweight polymer panels? I know that one of the big plastics companies were chasing Ford Australia about a year ago to implement lightweight precoloured panels for Orion. With the current focus on fuel consumption and performance it seems like a reasonable path for mass produced mid market vehicles to now take. Also 310 fwkw, with an upgrade path..... Regards,aa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fat-Tony Member 5,364 Member For: 18y 10m 23d Posted 01/10/06 08:40 AM Author Share Posted 01/10/06 08:40 AM Thanks for clearing it up Robin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trough Lolly Member 4,349 Member For: 20y 5m 5d Gender: Male Location: Mildura Posted 05/02/07 01:16 PM Share Posted 05/02/07 01:16 PM the FPV range would probably keep the bigger snails id say... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
did_4m41 Member 26 Member For: 18y 22d Posted 05/02/07 05:10 PM Share Posted 05/02/07 05:10 PM will next gen F6 produce over 300kW? if so, how about V8? I dun think so, I think they will just improve the handling and fuel consumption, and overall quality.about the turbo, how about twin turbo? (think of RB26DETT) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now