Fat-Tony Member 5,364 Member For: 18y 10m 20d Posted 29/09/06 10:11 AM Share Posted 29/09/06 10:11 AM Ok im told by a source at FoMoCo that in the future the turbos on our beloved cars will be downsized due to the fact that ford are sick of the warrenty claims associated with people modiying the cars and making extra power ect. Told that the smaller turbos will only allow the motor to produce 300kw at the motor. Can anyone confirm this for me at all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flukey Seriously Flukey Member Donating Members 4,354 Member For: 20y 10m 20d Gender: Male Location: Melbourne Posted 29/09/06 10:13 AM Share Posted 29/09/06 10:13 AM Surely though, Ford would just deny warranty claims if that was the case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cobrav8 Member 1,969 Member For: 19y 10m 17d Gender: Male Location: New Zealand Posted 29/09/06 10:18 AM Share Posted 29/09/06 10:18 AM More like they would use the smallest/cheapest turbo that is required for the job to save on costs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetute Donating Members 4,553 Member For: 21y 9d Gender: Male Location: brisbane Posted 29/09/06 10:20 AM Share Posted 29/09/06 10:20 AM would be a bad move... considering what Expensive Daewoo has just brought out... such a move would only cost fomoco sales Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BFHOON Donating Members 1,932 Member For: 18y 10m 17d Gender: Male Location: nsw Posted 29/09/06 10:27 AM Share Posted 29/09/06 10:27 AM or boost second hand ba/bf sales Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xtreme F6 Team Xtreme Donating Members 1,680 Member For: 20y 2d Gender: Male Location: Perth Posted 29/09/06 10:29 AM Share Posted 29/09/06 10:29 AM I wouldnt think so, there is more then just a simple choice as to why the turbo sizing was used in the first place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tab Sucker Moderating Team 32,303 Member For: 20y 9m 16d Gender: Male Location: Brisbane Posted 29/09/06 10:32 AM Share Posted 29/09/06 10:32 AM Makes sense though, why would the tight arses over-engineer a product? The bean counters have obviously figured out they can do the same with less. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fat-Tony Member 5,364 Member For: 18y 10m 20d Posted 29/09/06 10:42 AM Author Share Posted 29/09/06 10:42 AM I wouldnt think so, there is more then just a simple choice as to why the turbo sizing was used in the first place.←Yes its that which makes me think hang on a minute, I remember when they developed the car in the first place that they used such a big turbo for a reason.Why would they change it? Why wouldnt someone just put a different turbo from a BA/BF onto it?Just doesnt all add up to me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F6 UTE - Track Bound EVO III - Member 3,367 Member For: 20y 1m 26d Gender: Male Location: Strapped in and holding on Posted 29/09/06 01:23 PM Share Posted 29/09/06 01:23 PM A smaller one would boost quicker, and still provide the top end required. Why not indeed.?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mickey_gee Member 593 Member For: 20y 3m 26d Gender: Male Location: Newcastle NSW Posted 29/09/06 02:25 PM Share Posted 29/09/06 02:25 PM didnt they use 3540s because they were cheap and easy to get anyway? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now