Income Demograpic Of T Owners

[sixfan]

you fuggen.....I was going to call you a Hippie, but you're not, a Hippy has the comon decency to live 20 to a room and eat cheap lentils!Not out scoffing Armagnac!

←

22 Year Old 'Bas Armagnac' at that

Lumpy

←

OK,

now listen carefully,

listen closely....

are you listening?

a lot of us here could afford to drink that every day if we wanted to.

get a job!

[Lumpen]

a lot of us here could afford to drink that every day if we wanted to.

←

Ahhhh, but would you want to drink it everyday? That is the question?

The literal (Dutch) translation is Burning Wine and be buggered if it doesn't

Lumpy

[sixfan]

a lot of us here could afford to drink that every day if we wanted to.

←

Ahhhh, but would you want to drink it everyday? That is the question?

The literal (Dutch) translation is Burning Wine and be buggered if it doesn't

Lumpy

←

you are right,

I'll stick to my Oban, Lagavoulin, Talisker and Glenmorange

[SHOCK]

Whats wrong with VAT 69??????

Just jokn

[sixfan]

Oh you win.

I'm to drunk for this

[Lumpen]

Please refrain from reading this, as it will be On-Topic.

AUSTRALIA'S super rich are earning a larger share of national income than at any time since 1950 - and the huge salaries paid to chief executives may be to blame, latest statistics show.

In 1992 the salaries of chief executives were 25 times the average worker's salary - but by 2002 they were 100 times the average.

In the 2003-04 tax year, the richest 1 per cent of individuals earned 9.2 per cent of individual income - up from 8.8 per cent in the previous year and double their share of 25 years ago.

To enter the 1 per cent club, individuals had to earn more than $148,366 - a rise of more than $12,000 on the previous year. This group had not enjoyed such a large slice of income since a huge rise in wool prices in 1950.

So, I wonder how many 1%ers we truly have?

Lumpy

[Buf-Phoon]

those bloody 1%ers .... bastards

[turtle33]

Please refrain from reading this, as it will be On-Topic.

<div class='bbimg'>

</div>

AUSTRALIA'S super rich are earning a larger share of national income than at any time since 1950 - and the huge salaries paid to chief executives may be to blame, latest statistics show.

In 1992 the salaries of chief executives were 25 times the average worker's salary - but by 2002 they were 100 times the average.

In the 2003-04 tax year, the richest 1 per cent of individuals earned 9.2 per cent of individual income - up from 8.8 per cent in the previous year and double their share of 25 years ago.

To enter the 1 per cent club, individuals had to earn more than $148,366 - a rise of more than $12,000 on the previous year. This group had not enjoyed such a large slice of income since a huge rise in wool prices in 1950.

So, I wonder how many 1%ers we truly have?

Lumpy

←

not us poor hard done by builders, we would never ever earn anything like that, just think I went to uni and everthing and still ended up on the tools. Builders dont make good accountants, if we did there would be no black economy my 4 fav words "how much for cash" right behind "I need sex now"

[Lumpen]

Builders dont make good accountants, if we did there would be no black economy my 4 fav words "how much for cash"

←

Ahhhhhhhhhhh, 'Whats the Best you can Do'...Music to my ears, it's the same with Antique Dealers

Lumpy

[tab]

not us poor hard done by builders, we would never ever earn anything like that (on the books)

←

Fixed it up for you turtle....dodgy bloody builders