Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Lifetime Members
  • Member For: 22y 4m 10d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Melbourne

that's right, guys like Craig and I were running 11's with piggybacks before edit was even around and enjoyed our cars and the performance they gave for a year or 2 where we would have had nothing at all.

And and 11 second car is not slow in anyones books I don't think!

I will try and dig up some of my old timeslips before the phase 2 and 3 kits were fitted and see what I was running with the Unichip and cold air intake. Now edit is here and we don't have to fight the ecu but work with it, of course the end result is superior.

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Faster than any BTA,XTC,Autotech, Nizpro and Tunehouse car
  • Member
  • Member For: 21y 11m 17d
  • Location: D SHIRE!
  blueboost said:
credit where its due guy's the APS kitted C/v car did run a 10.9 @125mph, with all torque limits still in place, with the only internal mod being valve springs.

Sorry but the C&V car was running a built motor forgie pistons and billet rods and con has told me himself he would have gone alot quicker with that pwr with an Edit as Geea has proved :spoton:

  • Member
  • Member For: 21y 12d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Mackay NorthQueensland

the motor was valve springs only internal, you can check with C/V,

and yes they would have easly got beter with the edit, 10.5ish I would expect with out the torque limits, but that was no where to be seen,(this is back in 03.) that is all I am saying, edit is beter but the piggy's have done a reasonable job until the edit could be set up.

  • Member
  • Member For: 19y 7m 21d
  • Location: South East Suburbs

Guys this might be a bit of a noob :spoton: question but why haven't any after market ECU manufacturers (motech, microtech, autronic etc) made any aftermarket ECU's. is it just because the factory one is so tunable?

Thanks

Edited by jonom
  • Member
  • Member For: 21y 12d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Mackay NorthQueensland

yes as they are getting to know the sct software, it is getting better, and also I think they ave had trouble picking up some signals from the sensers with the arfter market ones.

but I think motec and Nizpro have done a fair bit of this, but it would be a lot more expensive.

also the production car xr6t was runnig a different computer to, I can't remember which one, but there is a post somewhere on that here.

David

  • Donating Members
  • Member For: 21y 7m 12d
  • Location: Sydney
  DBOSS said:
  blueboost said:
credit where its due guy's the APS kitted C/v car did run a 10.9 @125mph, with all torque limits still in place, with the only internal mod being valve springs.

Sorry but the C&V car was running a built motor forgie pistons and billet rods and con has told me himself he would have gone alot quicker with that pwr with an Edit as Geea has proved :spoton:

No it wasn't. They went on record in numerous publications saying that it was stock internals. Either way your point is moot because it was tuned by unichip.

Edit will allow you to run higher stall converters for quicker ETs but for MPH unichip can do everything it can. That's been shown time and time again so accept it and move on.

  • Wanabe mechanical engineer
  • Donating Members
  • Member For: 20y 8m 22d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: At the computer, obviously.....
  Geeseman said:
  DBOSS said:
  blueboost said:
credit where its due guy's the APS kitted C/v car did run a 10.9 @125mph, with all torque limits still in place, with the only internal mod being valve springs.

Sorry but the C&V car was running a built motor forgie pistons and billet rods and con has told me himself he would have gone alot quicker with that pwr with an Edit as Geea has proved :laughing:

No it wasn't. They went on record in numerous publications saying that it was stock internals. Either way your point is moot because it was tuned by unichip.

Edit will allow you to run higher stall converters for quicker ETs but for MPH unichip can do everything it can. That's been shown time and time again so accept it and move on.

Where has it been shown time and time again? I'm curious...

  • Member
  • Member For: 21y 12d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Mackay NorthQueensland

yes APS was using it to sell there kits, in the mag's, it was spiecal at the time. even now its not bad.

I am not trying to stick up for Geeseman, I don't even know him, but what C/V done back then was real good for the T. it started the highperformance snowball

David

  • Faster than any BTA,XTC,Autotech, Nizpro and Tunehouse car
  • Member
  • Member For: 21y 11m 17d
  • Location: D SHIRE!
  Geeseman said:
  DBOSS said:
  blueboost said:
credit where its due guy's the APS kitted C/v car did run a 10.9 @125mph, with all torque limits still in place, with the only internal mod being valve springs.

Sorry but the C&V car was running a built motor forgie pistons and billet rods and con has told me himself he would have gone alot quicker with that pwr with an Edit as Geea has proved :spoton:

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

No it wasn't. They went on record in numerous publications saying that it was stock internals. Either way your point is moot because it was tuned by unichip.

Con himself told me last week when I was at C&V while Jnr was removing he's uni-jip and getting the edit and he told me that the motor had been built.

  • Member
  • Member For: 21y 12d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Mackay NorthQueensland

I think you should ring him again, and ask him, because if he told you that, he has been doing some fibbing. he has told a lot of people that it was stock interal except valvesprings, I will try and post up the article.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
  • Create New...
'