F6 UTE - Track Bound EVO III - Member 3,367 Member For: 20y 10d Gender: Male Location: Strapped in and holding on Posted 19/06/05 06:16 AM Share Posted 19/06/05 06:16 AM One thing that people seem to misinterpret when working out power loss etc is how they convert RWKW back to FWKW.If you say your car has a loss of 30% power from the FW to the RW then the correct way to work out the FW and RW power would be as following;For eg your car made 223rwkw with an assumed 30% drive train loss.RWKW to FWRW Method 1. 223rwkw x 1.3 = 289.9fwkwMethod 2. 223rwkw / 0.7 = 318.57fwkwNow if you work the other way FWKW to RWKWMethod 1.289.9fwkw x 0.7 = 202.93rwkw WRONGMethod 2.318.57fwkw x 0.7 = 223rwkw CORRECTSo you can see that going from rwkw to fwkw Method 2 is the correct mathematical way of working out the fwkw. Most people always use Method 1, which is wrong!!!Thus if you car is making 223rwkw it would have the following rwkw;20% power loss = 278.75fwkw25% power loss = 297.33fwkw30% power loss = 318.57fwkw <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Like I said, it's pretty healthy for a bone stock car. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vuster Member 112 Member For: 20y 1m 22d Location: Melbourne Posted 19/06/05 07:04 AM Share Posted 19/06/05 07:04 AM Turbocorty, that's a quick car. I just opened it up using Windows movie maker. Measured the 0-100km/h time by comparing frame differences.I calculated it was a 5.33 second run.I.e. Time when needles starts moving off at 0km/h=2.87sTime when needle reaches 100km/h=8.28.2-2.87=5.33 seconds Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YOOT Member 1,201 Member For: 21y 6m 7d Location: Birkdale Posted 19/06/05 08:47 AM Share Posted 19/06/05 08:47 AM One thing that people seem to misinterpret when working out power loss etc is how they convert RWKW back to FWKW.If you say your car has a loss of 30% power from the FW to the RW then the correct way to work out the FW and RW power would be as following;For eg your car made 223rwkw with an assumed 30% drive train loss.RWKW to FWRW Method 1. 223rwkw x 1.3 = 289.9fwkwMethod 2. 223rwkw / 0.7 = 318.57fwkwNow if you work the other way FWKW to RWKWMethod 1.289.9fwkw x 0.7 = 202.93rwkw WRONGMethod 2.318.57fwkw x 0.7 = 223rwkw CORRECTSo you can see that going from rwkw to fwkw Method 2 is the correct mathematical way of working out the fwkw. Most people always use Method 1, which is wrong!!!Thus if you car is making 223rwkw it would have the following rwkw;20% power loss = 278.75fwkw25% power loss = 297.33fwkw30% power loss = 318.57fwkw <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Or just use the dyno for what its meant for, before and after gains. % gain at the wheels equals percentage gain at the fly, end of story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turbocorty Donating Members 178 Member For: 21y 2m 26d Gender: Male Location: Melbourne Posted 19/06/05 09:44 AM Author Share Posted 19/06/05 09:44 AM I have done a number of runs using the G-tech Pro with the best time being 5.4...but on average it gets 5.5 - 5.6second to 100.I wonder how the guy's at motor are changing gears if the could only manage 6 point something.I think Ford has told the the mags to report it as slower than the HSV for political reasons!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SavageF6 Donating Members 1,622 Member For: 20y 8m 7d Gender: Male Location: Sydney Posted 19/06/05 02:06 PM Share Posted 19/06/05 02:06 PM Thanks for the vid! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wee Dougie Member 23 Member For: 19y 4m 8d Location: Palm Nth (NZ) Posted 18/08/05 09:08 PM Share Posted 18/08/05 09:08 PM OK Im saving for a Typhoon now!I thought my standard T was quick but that was great!Big ups on the gear changes! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now