Jump to content

Vaporate


cikas

Recommended Posts

  • Lifetime Members
  • Member For: 22y 1m 26d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Albany Creek QLD

Theres been plenty of these types of schemes over the years.

If they could work on a device that would reduce depreciation by 20% a year that would be a winner!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 24
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Everyone must rush to get one of these to go with their tornado fuel saver. With these two combined you will go 1000km on a tank!  :laughing:

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

and the condensator, ioniser, polariser hey soon brocky will endorse it!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
  • Member For: 20y 2m 17d
  • Location: Mexico
Seriously I cant see how this can work - wouldnt the on board computer adjust itself cancelling any fuel saving effect?

Must admit though - nice and simple in design

Scoot

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I think your right on the money. It's a sound idea but without calibration of the injector system, the two should be inconflict.

Increasing the combustion efficiency of an engine increases the exhaust oxygen percentage. The computer will add extra fuel to the engine to maintain set combustion ratios, when the oxegen sensor in the exhaust reads the mixture as being lean - it'll just push more in.

And if you could manage to resolve this, the variation in fuel quality available on the market would throw the system out every time you filled up.

If its such a good idea (and cheap) then why would manufacturers be using it already?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • My new toy
  • Lifetime Members
  • Member For: 21y 9m 9d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: stanthorpe wine capital of qld.

One of the major things about fuel injected cars is they pump excess fuel and return it to the tank so it does not get to hot so why would we want to heat it up again.

Sounds suss to me.

Ian

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Firm Member
  • Donating Members
  • Member For: 22y 2m 30d
  • Location: Adelaide Hills

crap crap crap.

How pi$$ed would all the major makers be at spending millions each year on research in improving their engines efficency at a snails pace when these clowns claim 20% (yes 20%!!) of fuel goes down your exhaust unburnt. Give me a break.

Load of absolute crap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
  • Member For: 21y 8m 13d
  • Location: Hoddles Creek (VIC)

What a bunch of scepticist's you are!, if any of you had used it then maybe I would take any of what you have said as advice, there's only one way to find out if it's BS or not and that's to test it yourself.

If you actually read all of the write up you will see that they got their best best results on vehicles that already have a heavy fuel use, typically 15 l/100 and up.

This is the first 300 buck's I'm gonna spend before any thing else.

Suck it and see. :spoton:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
  • Member For: 20y 2m 17d
  • Location: Mexico
...........there's only one way to find out if it's BS or not and that's to test it yourself.....

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

There are other ways! But go for your life mate.

Lots of people apply your philosophy to recreational drugs and that appears to work :stirthepot:

Edited by Turbofalke
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
  • Create New...
'