Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • loitering with intent
  • Lifetime Members
  • Member For: 21y 9m 27d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Zombie Birdhouse
  harvestgreenxr said:
is bracks the victorian premier, damn the australian government has turned into a bunch of softcocks I bet bracks has gone over 130kph, he probarly couldn't control the car and was sh*ting himself

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I should clarify for the yungins,back in the 70s,just like now Expensive Daewoo and Ford were doing the one upmanship,every model realeased was more powerfull than the next

So our wise over paid knobbhead pollys basically banned high power cars.

The car makers were doing it for the Bathurst races the hardy ferodo 500 :gooff:

Ah yes they were the days. ...no pufta safety cars back then,no pufta safe fences,just barbed wire ones,send out the tow truck,,, and the race went on :msm:

Sheer madness ,but it was good..

You youngins,grabb an old Bathurst tape and check it out,crazy stuff :pooh:

vik of the overboost

  • Member
  • Member For: 22y 6m 17d
  • Location: Sydney Australia

I hope Bracks gets hit by a truck doing 40/km/h in a zone that should be 70km/h his legislation on 40km/h hopefully killing him very very very slowly. This guy is a loonitic taking away our right to be individual and enjoy things we love. Cars are part of humanity and individuality NO ONE HAS THE RIGHT TO TAKE THIS AWAY FROM US. Bracks you son of a bit*ch I wish bad things apon you.

Damb I wish I knew Voodoo.

  • Member
  • Member For: 21y 11m 27d
  • Location: Birkdale

They would be contradicting their laws if this passed. Since their policy is to fine you for speeding if you go 3kmh over the posted limit, and the highest limit is 110, there fore speed limiting cars so that they reduce the road toll would require them to hav the limit set at 113 or they are encouraging speeding?!

Guest pauly
  • Guests
  rednut99 said:
They would be contradicting their laws if this passed. Since their policy is to fine you for speeding if you go 3kmh over the posted limit, and the highest limit is 110, there fore speed limiting cars so that they reduce the road toll would require them to hav the limit set at 113 or they are encouraging speeding?!

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Very valid point rednut99.

that's why the figure of 130 is being thrown around!!!!

You could still break the speed limit by 20 kmh and keep all that precious

speed camera revenue coming in.

Wht not speed limit all cars to 110 kmh and you will never see another camera on these stretches of road again!

Lets face it, all state governments have become highly dependant on all this :crybaby: CAMERA REVENUE. Why would they want to lose some revenue?

This whole topic is "A STORM IN A TEA CUP".

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
  • Create New...
'