Jump to content

Stone chips


Recommended Posts

  • Former XT pilot
  • Lifetime Members
  • Member For: 21y 10m 4d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: The Womb
  Cro said:
Stone chips?

Had about 200 of them till my car got resprayed after 35,000kms...

I think it needs another... :spoton:

  • Replies 36
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Forum Superhero
  • Donating Members
  • Member For: 21y 6m
  • Location: Eastern Suburbs of Mexico

Not bashing but the paint is thin, I am sure Ford are'nt the only only ones, at the end of the day stone chips are a part of driving on the roads, if you want to avoid them, leave the car in the garage........ :gooff:

  • Member
  • Member For: 21y 11m 22d

Blueprint shows up the stone chips. So I got my car done with the Polaris stoneguard film. The stoneguard is not noticeable on the car and has done the job of limiting the chips at the front, loading area of the boot, door handles.

  • Forum Superhero
  • Donating Members
  • Member For: 21y 6m
  • Location: Eastern Suburbs of Mexico
  Henry said:
I've been banging the drum for the Polaris stuff on here for 6 months. Cant give it a too bigger wrap.

Bras look crap compared to this almost invisible film. The only thing I have found so far is that it wont stop a bullet sized stone from cracking your foggies. (Get the Territory covers for these).

Where can you get it done? :spoton:

  • Member
  • Member For: 22y 16d
  • Location: sydney

I have just checked the paint thickness on my car with a calibrated digital coating thickness guage.

The doors & roof were approx 110 - 115um, whilst the bonnet was around 120 - 130 um.

I checked a workmates Saab, and it had 110um average on the bonnet, whilst our Mitsubishi Triton ute had only 75-80 um on the bonnet.

Cheers

PSI

  • Member
  • Member For: 22y 16d
  • Location: sydney
  JB said:
Bit of spare time at the moment PSI? :ermm: :lol:

Ouch JB !

I thought that my field trip to the car park & subsequent results would have warranted a nobel prize for services to science, not public ridicule........

but to answer your question..... um yeah just a bit of spare time . :lol: :lol:

cheers

psi :ermm:

  • Forum Superhero
  • Donating Members
  • Member For: 21y 6m
  • Location: Eastern Suburbs of Mexico
  P.S.I said:
  JB said:
Bit of spare time at the moment PSI? :ermm:  :lol:

Ouch JB !

I thought that my field trip to the car park & subsequent results would have warranted a nobel prize for services to science, not public ridicule........

but to answer your question..... um yeah just a bit of spare time . :lol: :lol:

cheers

psi :ermm:

:lol: Yeah, not really having a go, just seems like everytime non work stuff is done someone thinks it's smart to have a go! :ermm: Mind you I admire the fact that you had the thought to go and measure and work it out.

Probably like me now writing this post! :lol: Someone's bound to try and be smart!

  • Donating Members
  • Member For: 21y 3m 11d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Sydney
  P.S.I said:
I have just checked the paint thickness on my car with a calibrated digital coating thickness guage.

The doors & roof were approx 110 - 115um, whilst the bonnet was around 120 - 130 um.

I checked a workmates Saab, and it had 110um average on the bonnet, whilst our Mitsubishi Triton ute had only 75-80 um on the bonnet.

Cheers

PSI

Well, I'd love you to measure the thickness on my T. Even the Late model camira I HAD to drive prior to the T had better quality paint work than Ford have put on this one. Even my XE lasted better than the crap Ford painted with one with.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
  • Create New...
'