Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Member
  • Member For: 20y 10m 15d
  • Location: New Zealand

Hey guys< im in Nz and have just taken delivry of my new pride and joy, my previous was an au2 xr6 and when I fitted it with extractors, a k & n and went from using 91octane to 98octane I gained roughly 30kw and my fuel economy got better by about 25% due to better breathing and more power per stroke, is this not the case with the turbo? your thoughts are appriciated :k24t:

Guest dingah
  • Guests

Hmm mattpwc, more air through the filter means higher not lower fuel consumption as in order to retain the correct air/fuel ratio more air requires more fuel. THe combination of the two gives slightly more power, however. Logically better fuel consumption should be a fallacy. Maybe due to less weight in the wallet?

Cheers,

Dingah

  • Member
  • Member For: 21y 5m 19d
  • Location: South of Melbourne, near the sea

fitted a BMC panel filter @ $135 dolllars to replace my dirty 30K km original fitment a couple of weeks back (probably didnt really need replacing but was a good excuse).

Cant say I notice any difference in fuel economy but I only really use the Ave reading and havent re-set since fitting the BMC (13L/100Km). Also I have never heard this blow-off and flutter or induction noise that people refer to either before or after fitting (perhaps coz mines an auto?).

The T does now seem a bit more responsive in the mid-range at part throttle.

My view is that it's probably debatable value at $135 to replace a filter in a new T but a worth while upgrade at 30K kms plus, once the original is getting dirty and loosing it's flow capacity.

Havent tried the XR8 2nd CAI mod yet - anyone know how much a new airbox bottom is to replace if you stuff it up or don't like it?

  • EMS makes MAGIC MUMBO !
  • Member
  • Member For: 21y 4m 9d
  • Location: Melbourne

The way I understand fuel consumption with reduced inlet restriction (Read better filter) is that assuming you don't make any allowance for more air/fuel, causing more power, therefore greater road speed, that consumption would increase. But the fact that it is then breathing better, you need to back off the throttle (It might only be a couple of percent) which means the car is now doing the same speed as before, but with a small percentage less throttle.

ie. Before say 50% throttle to hold X KM/Hr

After possibly only 48% Throttle to hold the same X KM/Hr

As long as my understanding is correct, putting in a panel filter should increase the enonomy slighly !

This of course doesn't take into consideration the computer compensating for and measuring the increased airflow !

Does anybody know how the computer works out it's A/F ratio ? Does it work off Throttle Position, or would it just take a reading at the Oxy sensor and compensate for a leaner mixture ? If this is the case ignore my ramblings from above and I'll just see what happens in the next couple of weeks when I fit one myself !

  • FORD FORD FORD
  • Donating Members
  • Member For: 22y 1m 4d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Victoria Point In Brissy's eastern side
  rainy said:
  plonky said:
berach of EPA regulations.

whats a berach :censored:

Don't worry he's just using Goldie's dictionary

Scotty

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
  • Create New...
'