ratter

sounds like it may be overboosting, but things need to be diagnosed correctly

power should be the same but torque would be different

are you an engineer?   one of my customers is an engineer at ford and was involved in the front section, he has told me that even though it is plastic it is structural. Many cars these days use composite materials in the structural strength of the cars being built, it not heavy steel so much these days, believe it or not, the windscreen in most cars adds to the structural strength of the roof.   Once that bar has been cut from the support, it is a panel shop job to replace the radiator support panel if a legit rwc is required, plus any other repairs from "trimming" the metal bars

I do not believe it may fit the territory awd, I was talking to Steve today from PWR and without having the car in front of us we believe the driveshaft would interfere with the unit, happy to be corrected

On FG's the support bar across the radiator support panel must be removed with pretty much all the aftermarket coolers except the 2 stepped coolers

It shouldn't cause any issues at all but if under warranty best leaving the factory item in place as if it fails they would cover the trans anyway

on a FG the bar gets cut out totally

     answered for me :)

quite a few members have asked for a group buy on these PWR ZF Heat excahangers so here it is     http://www.fordxr6turbo.com/forum/topic/85717-pwr-zf-heatexchanger-group-buy/

quite a few members have asked for a group buy on these coolers so here it is http://www.fordxr6turbo.com/forum/topic/85717-pwr-zf-heatexchanger-group-buy/

quite a few members have asked for a group buy on these coolers so here it is http://www.fordxr6turbo.com/forum/topic/85717-pwr-zf-heatexchanger-group-buy/

some people also put some black tape over an illuminated "engine" light and think there car is working fine

Not true!

our workshop scan tool allows us to recalibrate them so would assume most shops would be able to do it if they have good equipment

the cooler is lower than the stock unit so there really should be no issues at all and it is located under the passenger seat area not behind the dash

Bring the car to us and we can sell you one and we'll even fit it for you

here's the sensor

no idea which sensor is used in his situation, may be fitting the replacement sensor later this week

this was posted elsewhere

let us know what they say, will get a pic a bit later on

that was my argument and don't believe GM would accept it either,

same style, the plugs are different

My fuel module on my dyno previously has shown United E85 to be around 83-85%, even though the test tune showed anywhere from 88-92% for the same fuel, previous Zietronix tester that we fitted read pretty much identical to my dyno and use the same GM sender unit, the latest Zeitronix gauge we fitted uses a different sensor and would only read around 78% while my dyno showed 82-83%, after many phone calls and different tests we sent the sender back to the distributor who contacted Zeitronix and in the end they said there can be a 5% error margin. They sent me a new sender but it has not been fitted at this stage to see if it is closer to a correct reading

peak should be what is quoted

$1.34