Headsex

Tell ya what.. On ebay there is a FPV GTP complete interior.. will prob go for $1500 (its $1350 now).. Damn wish I had a extra $500..

So is this the mob that does it for Ford ? Or they can do the same thing ? Danny.

Ahhh, Your the man jack ! Will save some pennies and go visit them I think Danny.

Got a picture of one with sports leather, and one without ? danny.

Hi Guys, 2 questions.. When a turbo comes fitted with Sports leather. Are the door trims any different compared to the normal xr6t ? Does anyone have / know where I can get myself full Spots leather interior Danny.

Just the $30 Cable from ford.. NO Amp.. I'm gonna get myself one of those exy modules from Shockf6 as I have a whine in mine... Maybe its the turbo engine that causes it.. as my mates v8 one doesnt have the whine.. Danny.

THAT EBAY DUDE IS ON A MONEY SPINNER.. They are BRAND NEW, FROM FORD. for $30 !!! and he is getting upto $100 for a auction Just for the AUX IN cable the other day some guy bought one for $71. couldnt help contacting that buyer and telling him he was just bent over .. Danny.

If the oil presure fitting is 1/8th NTP male thread. then yes..

The boats already gone...

I could really comment here. But this would be turning it into a personal attack, which I am not interested in doing. As I am not a "tuning" company, nor do I make money in "tuning". There is no need for me to bias on which system is the most best to go with based on profitable benefit. I am unsubscribing myself from this thread as it has turned to pure Danny.

Lol.. I told ya's. Im a one eyed Mobil Synergy 8000 guy.. Hense why I said I'd almost recommend.. I do recommend it. But its a inconveniance for me to get boost98. I do occasionally and have no problems using it time and time again Danny.

What does that mean exactly? ← If it was conveniant.. For me to get it is a bit of a hastle.. mobil is the cloest servo Danny

yeah Phil, I'm with you on that.. It may be harder to adjust when cam changes.. But once you get it right again, its easy.. There's a excel spread sheet you can use, which you have "commanded A/F" vs "Actual Airfuel" you put the error in, and it tells you what numbers to replace it with.. Danny

I believe it depends on mix percentage.. If it was bad, Ford would denie your claim cos you uses ethonol based fuel. Danny ← look on the fuel cap of the BF, it says you can run E10 fuel in the car. I dont think they will deny any warrenty problems related to the use of ethonol blend fuel. ← Yeah, that's my point.. If 10% ethonol mix was bad. you would not have Ford giving warentee on E10 related problems.. Danny

Changing a Cam. I disagree, altering the tables to bring the mixtures back into line again is far easier than starting fresh on a new After market ecu. As for putting the ford ECU onto another engine as a holden. Then yes, I agree, Aftermarket ecu will be heaps quicker to tune. But you wouldnt get no were near the same quality of tune. Manufactorers spend thousands of hours fine tuning things like cold starts etc. As Dave said, even after spending plenty of time on BCL's motec tuning, they still had problems. Stalling etc. At the end of the day, I dont know why any tuner would take it upon himself to Fully tune a aftermarket ecu onto the ford when there is a editable computer sitting there saying Please, tune me.. Dynowog, The ford does not use Guestimations or Oxy sensors for fuel control. If you open your CAPA/SCT training manual, you will see the big formula on page 73 used for the fuel control.. Unless you fell asleep during the course @ Amberley's last September(I saw many get some Shutteye during the course, Where you one of them??), either way you should understand it quite well.. Using the table names in the SCT software, it looks like this MAP - (map_at_zero_aircharge * Y_Intercept_Corr_of_Map_vrs_Aircharge) * ((560/(act+460)) * voleff_corr_for_ECT&ACT) ---------------------------------------------------------------- slope_of_MAP_vrs_aircharge * (1 + egr_flow /100)

I believe it depends on mix percentage.. If it was bad, Ford would denie your claim cos you uses ethonol based fuel. Danny

Lol.. Second of all was its after 5:30 and I'm going home Danny

In my experiance with my AU XR8, I swore by Mobil synergy 8000.. THe "other" fuels wouldnt go as good and some even pingged depending on tempreture/humitity.. Synergy 8000 had no problems.. It was tuned by the way.. I tried the boost98. and I found I picked up more response over the synergy8000. So I would almost highly recommend it.. Danny

Remember guys, I got a spare set of Pods available, brand new.. send me a PM if your keen.. Danny

Doesnt it just look horn? I see you glued your rings onto your pods.. can see a bit of white oxidation on the plastic.. And you gotta clean up the glue on the glass where it bleed through the gaps.. I got a bit of bleeding on mine, but I cleaned it up with a blunt metal object (a bottle opener infact.. lol Danny

It needs that many points becasuse its interpolation is crap and its a DUMB system, meaning it has no thermodynamic model of the actual cylinder mass within the chamber - unlike the factory system. ← First of all, Dynowog, I dont even know why you mentioned the fuel load points. In the ford system its totally irrelavent, its the Commanded Air Fuel. not the "milliseconds of injection". The ford system calculates the required injection pulse. unlike most if not all aftermarket systems which you have to specify the fuel injection Millisecond period based on Load (map or tps) Vs Spark. This is why the ford system requires the "thermodynamic model of actual cylinder mass" as rob mentioned. I would hate tuning a ECU with that many load points, it would be a upmost waste of time tuning every single point. if the aftermarket ecu had decent interpolation and accuracy, there would be no need for such a big table. That goes for Any aftermarket ecu. Danny.

Thanks Dave.. You basically ttook my thoughts and made it better than I would have.. I am a firm believe that if you can modify the existing ECU, Stick with it. Car makers spend 100fold what aftermarket ecu's spend in development. That in itself should be a indication of the level of development. Anyways, I hope that post of your Dave has opened some peoples eyes Danny.

I got myself one the other week. easy to install.. Problem,. I've got a awful whine which changes pitch/tone with engine revs.. How does one get rid of this? Danny.

The engine is fitted with a oil presure switch.. When it drops below a certain presure, it cuts out.. As to what this does? Unsure.. Maybe turns engine off? Is oil temp electronic or mechanical? Switching between the two would be cool Danny.

The Sandwidth plate in my opinion is a bad idea. The guys selling the autometer guages say that's what you need.. But when I went to parts next door with the quoted part number, we looked for ages (both me and the spares guy were looking for a T piece).. we went back to guys selling the guages sayign we cant find it. He came and grabbed it for us. We both looked at him with a look like get out of here.. The only reason I would use a sandwitch plate is if I had a Oil Cooler. If you get the T-Piece, it bolts straight onto the existing oil presure point, and extends that out 1.5 inches or so, and the original oil presure sensor gets put in, and on the side, the autometer's 1/8th thread goes in the side. As for the Oil Temp sensor. I am unsure what thread that uses. If it is 1/8th NPT, then yeah, this T-Piece I quoted before will work (VDO 230.032). But in my opinion, Stay away from the sandwitch plate Personally I would choose oil presure over oil temp. The turbo's ECU has built in Oil temp safety margins which dropps boost if oil temp goes beyond a certain point