Was the only thing I was disappointed in with the car when I bought it (new - 0kms) Zero bite and had to use a lot more pressure to stop at intersections etc that I should have had to - basically had to do an extra tap for a complete stop, the car just wanted to keep rolling with what should have been normal stopping pressure. This was for normal, suburban street driving. I'd never really given them a good flog and not up to the stage of them fading, so it wasn't the performance side of things I was annoyed with - they just felt weak and woeful from the get go. I was coming out of a 2002 Pajero with stock brakes, so it wasn't as if I was comparing them to something exotic. Maybe I got a bad batch of pads or fluid or something on my car from the factory, but I lasted 3 months with them like this and was constantly shaking my head at how woeful they were. T2 rotors and Bendix Ultimates bought the brakes straight up to what they should have been from the factory. I wasn't chasing track performance braking or hit your head on the windscreen stopping power, but something that was reliable and comfortable rather than something constantly having me thinking that they should be better. I do agree that the pads were probably the factor that made the most difference (perhaps all it needed was a fluid change), but if the NSW coppers tested in a car with the same brakes mine had then it's no wonder they demanded Bembro's on all service vehicles. You may be right and the stock brakes aren't usually that bad, but if there are enough people who had the same experiences as I did from mine then maybe there was some common denominator (maybe they changed OEM pads for a while to a crap supply)