I got shut down by some fellow forum members with downs syndrome some time back (won't be mentioning any names but they were fairly moronic to say the least) for trying to help others by mentioning the multiple uses for this product. Think of it like this, if I came onto this forum and said "oh there is this brand I heard about, called Ford, do they make any good cars?" Everyone would be happy to answer and what not. You do the same with anything else, and you're a "stooge". The reality is, they don't know what they're missing out on. People with no education might try and tell you it doesn't work (they certainly had none, if you can find the thread read it and see for yourself), but provide you with zero evidense of this. In general, engineers with multiple degree's can not only explain why it works, but Nulon themselves had engineers from the competition test some of there new formula's, and still came up with the goods. This product happens to be one of them. You can use it as an upper cylinder lube (prepare for some smoke though), double treat to help get rid of carbon deposits through bearings, rings and turbo's, you can put the stuff in old engines to help quiet them down a little (ie, my 354,000km astina, still going strong, still being thrashed, still refusing to die), and things like that. It may also increase your fuel efficiency, but you may not be able to tell all that much, as it may only be 2%. /rant ---------------------------------- As for the articles posted above, it was quite interesting to see that the high end Royal Purple stuff was fantastic, and so was the penrite gear (even the HPR, being a cheaper oil had a much higher shear strength, even though the results were the same when this was broken, at least it has a much higher chance of staying below the shear point). I've been saying to customers lately how good the penrite stuff is, this is just another bit of proof to add to the list. It all starts with the base stock, use a quality base, and work from there. Its a shame the nulon stuff isn't in this test, since in similar tests it had results near the pointy end of the field. I think the viscosity and temperature may not be ideal for this particular testing method, though. Something just doesn't add up with some of the results (ie, the Mobil1 results, I smell a bit of dead cow). Mobil 1 is one of the few pure, ester based synthetic oils where they can actually say 'fully synthetic' and not lie to you. I find this results VERY hard to believe. This post may not make huge sense and may be poorly typed out, look at the time, I jumped on to check ebay and ended up on here =/ Go figure.