JETURBO

Here’s one I did yesterday, yours should look closer to this

Yhon - Dah - az Yonda’s

Coatings on piston skirts have been out for yhondahzzz bro Always worthwhile addition to a slug

Not you Nath old mate…. Reads link and adds 1+1 and got 450 out of GT Dherrrrrrrrrrrrrrrhhhhhhhppppppp

Clearly you struggle to read as well as use simple search functions GTX G2 ———— 3576 not GT3576 ….

Yeh I’ve always just shown Marky love ❤️

Yeh khunt Whutttt ? you still asking chit questions after all these years and all the modded turbo falcons you’ve had ….. move on d3ck lips

Yep Aaron Wills / Spoolinboost punter G6ET and number 6 rod went walkies

Yep, a customer who I chose not to take on All Stathis lol

Now that’s cool

32 thousands…. Da fhuck

Years ago I made contact with Turbosmart regarding the lack of retained fuel pressure with their FPR series units. The best response was that the engineering is behind bleeding off not retaining…. Seems half arsed as maintaining rail pressure is favourable but Turbosmart’s objective is to deliver what is really important and so be it. What you’re seeing is completely normal and your plumbing is right

Happy Birthday Alex ! Hey they work, had plenty of customers buy them and fit them and they’re decent so that’s a win mate

Ha you’ll probably find Raceworks stuff is slightly different which is super common across hose suppliers. That said….. Raceworks anything is questionable at best so be careful with their fittings !!

Owmuch

Three’s a crowd bro its Omoh sex not an orgy 🤪 Next…..

Huh Did I miss something… ?

Bring it over ya omoh and I’ll make it fast for ya

You’ll understand why the Full HP Junkie head we fitted to the race ute was a big justification price wise but when you break it all down it’s actually not a bad price point as is all the top end products. Chits just expensive to go really fast

Seriously anything Nason is pure junk Never seen anything good from them new or once kms have gone on Ferra valves FTW

That’s busted arse Nath lol

Spot on with your mark up and what I’m trying to project ! There is no detriment to giving the port edge a chamfer in any case and does help with flap re seating obviously in some circumstances you can’t always get this beautiful dead on angle and this is where the additional tension can cause issues. Again we want pre load on the clevis to arm locator but be careful to not overshoot this as it’s very fine line when trying to control a lower boost target on a big turbo/big actuator and for anyone playing along about 1/4 is more than enough on a 12psi Genuine Garrett actuator to give 50/50 scope in the WGDC in the tune.

Setting up an actuator/bracket/angle can be tedious especially with bigger sized port & flaps so if you’ve got a flap that’s catching 9 times out of 10 it might not necessarily be the actual flap or port edge but the way the actuator arm is pushing/pulling in motion and as you can see from your top picture the arm of the flapper is right hand down, left hand up in regards to tension. This can lead to excessive flapper arm boar wear and cause “Wiggles” in the arm activation. If you play with housing rotation, bracket location, actuator can seating you can work a way for the flapper arm to be less pulled/pushed off kilter and operate on a inset outset method which conducts less angled pressure to flapper arm. Failing that and assuming the arm boar has excess wear now you might need to take a bevel edge approach to the port OD

Same as always mate !!!

Keif fix broken forum again