that's a valid point, but for the most of it, the majority of employers conduct Drug and Alcohol testing on the basis that it's a safety thing. Deep down inside the thinking is, no drugs and alcohol = harder workers, more production, less hassles. Within the industry I work in, the claim is the same. Safety. But within my industry I also see the point that is raised by Fat Tony's email. I do not support our current welfare system, there is by far no real means testing, and in terms of it's usage, if the government was real about how it was dispersed there would be far fewer people on welfare. For arguement sake. A lady whom I work with has a side business, a DVD door to door delivery service. You ring up with a movie you want to watch, her husband delivers it. Now as part of that service, you can also hire DVD players and TV's. Now for Centrelink customers a TV is deemed essential and for those who "rent" a TV from this company, Centrelink pays the company first before sending out the welfare payment to Centrelink customer. Neat huh ???? But why can't that principle be adopted across the board. Food, Electricity, Gas, Water all supposed essentials of living and then the customer gets their meagre $25 that's left over, I assure you, they would get off their asses pretty quick to find work. The government has never been real when it comes to welfare assistance, and for that we will continue to see Johnny Pot Smoker lining up every 2nd Thursday to pick up his Dole cheque along with Janey Alcoholic and both of their 35 companies they "applied" for work with.